The patch titled jsm: IRQ handlers doesn't need to have IRQ_DISABLED enabled has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was jsm-irq-handlers-doesnt-need-to-have-irq_disabled-enabled.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ Subject: jsm: IRQ handlers doesn't need to have IRQ_DISABLED enabled From: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Currently jsm is showing the following message when loaded: IRQ 432/JSM: IRQF_DISABLED is not guaranteed on shared IRQs It's because the request_irq() is called using IRQF_DISABLED and IRQF_SHARED. Actually there is no need to use IRQF_DISABLED in this driver. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Scott Kilau <scottk@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.c~jsm-irq-handlers-doesnt-need-to-have-irq_disabled-enabled drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.c --- a/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.c~jsm-irq-handlers-doesnt-need-to-have-irq_disabled-enabled +++ a/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.c @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int __devinit jsm_probe_one(struc } rc = request_irq(brd->irq, brd->bd_ops->intr, - IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_SHARED, "JSM", brd); + IRQF_SHARED, "JSM", brd); if (rc) { printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to hook IRQ %d\n",brd->irq); goto out_iounmap; _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from leitao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are linux-next.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html