+ poll-select-avoid-arithmetic-overflow-in-__estimate_accuracy.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     poll/select: avoid arithmetic overflow in __estimate_accuracy()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     poll-select-avoid-arithmetic-overflow-in-__estimate_accuracy.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: poll/select: avoid arithmetic overflow in __estimate_accuracy()
From: Guillaume Knispel <gknispel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

__estimate_accuracy() was prone to integer overflow, for example if *tv ==
{2147, 483648000} on a 32 bit computer (or even for delays as small as
{429, 500000000} if the task is niced).

Because the result was already forced between 0 and 100ms, the effect of
the overflow was not too problematic, but the use of the hrtimer range
feature was not optimal in overflow cases.

This patch ensures that there can not be an integer overflow in this
function.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Knispel <gknispel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/select.c |   14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/select.c~poll-select-avoid-arithmetic-overflow-in-__estimate_accuracy fs/select.c
--- a/fs/select.c~poll-select-avoid-arithmetic-overflow-in-__estimate_accuracy
+++ a/fs/select.c
@@ -41,22 +41,28 @@
  * better solutions..
  */
 
+#define MAX_SLACK	(100 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
+
 static long __estimate_accuracy(struct timespec *tv)
 {
 	long slack;
 	int divfactor = 1000;
 
+	if (tv->tv_sec < 0)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (task_nice(current) > 0)
 		divfactor = divfactor / 5;
 
+	if (tv->tv_sec > MAX_SLACK / (NSEC_PER_SEC/divfactor))
+		return MAX_SLACK;
+
 	slack = tv->tv_nsec / divfactor;
 	slack += tv->tv_sec * (NSEC_PER_SEC/divfactor);
 
-	if (slack > 100 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
-		slack =  100 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
+	if (slack > MAX_SLACK)
+		return MAX_SLACK;
 
-	if (slack < 0)
-		slack = 0;
 	return slack;
 }
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from gknispel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
poll-select-avoid-arithmetic-overflow-in-__estimate_accuracy.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux