The patch titled
spinlock: allow inlined spinlocks on s390
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
spinlock-allow-inlined-spinlocks-on-s390.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: spinlock: allow inlined spinlocks on s390
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -puN arch/s390/Kconfig~spinlock-allow-inlined-spinlocks-on-s390 arch/s390/Kconfig
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig~spinlock-allow-inlined-spinlocks-on-s390
+++ a/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ config S390
select HAVE_KRETPROBES
select HAVE_KVM if 64BIT
select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
+ select HAVE_SPINLOCK_INLINE_SUPPORT
select INIT_ALL_POSSIBLE
select HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
spinlock-move-spinlock-function-bodies-to-header-file.patch
spinlock-allow-inlined-spinlocks.patch
spinlock-allow-inlined-spinlocks-on-s390.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
