The patch titled
execve: must clear current->clear_child_tid
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
execve-must-clear-current-clear_child_tid-v2.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: execve: must clear current->clear_child_tid
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
While looking at Jens Rosenboom bug report
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/27/35) about strange sys_futex call done from
a dying "ps" program, we found following problem.
clone() syscall has special support for TID of created threads. This
support includes two features.
One (CLONE_CHILD_SETTID) is to set an integer into user memory with the
TID value.
One (CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID) is to clear this same integer once the created
thread dies.
The integer location is a user provided pointer, provided at clone()
time.
kernel keeps this pointer value into current->clear_child_tid.
At execve() time, we should make sure kernel doesnt keep this user
provided pointer, as full user memory is replaced by a new one.
As glibc fork() actually uses clone() syscall with CLONE_CHILD_SETTID and
CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID set, chances are high that we might corrupt user
memory in forked processes.
Following sequence could happen:
1) bash (or any program) starts a new process, by a fork() call that
glibc maps to a clone( ... CLONE_CHILD_SETTID | CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID
...) syscall
2) When new process starts, its current->clear_child_tid is set to a
location that has a meaning only in bash (or initial program) context
(&THREAD_SELF->tid)
3) This new process does the execve() syscall to start a new program.
current->clear_child_tid is left unchanged (a non NULL value)
4) If this new program creates some threads, and initial thread exits,
kernel will attempt to clear the integer pointed by
current->clear_child_tid from mm_release() :
if (tsk->clear_child_tid
&& !(tsk->flags & PF_SIGNALED)
&& atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1) {
u32 __user * tidptr = tsk->clear_child_tid;
tsk->clear_child_tid = NULL;
/*
* We don't check the error code - if userspace has
* not set up a proper pointer then tough luck.
*/
<< here >> put_user(0, tidptr);
sys_futex(tidptr, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL, NULL, 0);
}
5) OR : if new program is not multi-threaded, but spied by /proc/pid
users (ps command for example), mm_users > 1, and the exiting program
could corrupt 4 bytes in a persistent memory area (shm or memory mapped
file)
If current->clear_child_tid points to a writeable portion of memory of the
new program, kernel happily and silently corrupts 4 bytes of memory, with
unexpected effects.
Fix is straightforward and should not break any sane program.
Reported-by: Jens Rosenboom <jens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/fork.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/fork.c~execve-must-clear-current-clear_child_tid-v2 kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c~execve-must-clear-current-clear_child_tid-v2
+++ a/kernel/fork.c
@@ -573,18 +573,18 @@ void mm_release(struct task_struct *tsk,
* the value intact in a core dump, and to save the unnecessary
* trouble otherwise. Userland only wants this done for a sys_exit.
*/
- if (tsk->clear_child_tid
- && !(tsk->flags & PF_SIGNALED)
- && atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1) {
- u32 __user * tidptr = tsk->clear_child_tid;
+ if (tsk->clear_child_tid) {
+ if (!(tsk->flags & PF_SIGNALED) &&
+ atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1) {
+ /*
+ * We don't check the error code - if userspace has
+ * not set up a proper pointer then tough luck.
+ */
+ put_user(0, tsk->clear_child_tid);
+ sys_futex(tsk->clear_child_tid, FUTEX_WAKE,
+ 1, NULL, NULL, 0);
+ }
tsk->clear_child_tid = NULL;
-
- /*
- * We don't check the error code - if userspace has
- * not set up a proper pointer then tough luck.
- */
- put_user(0, tidptr);
- sys_futex(tidptr, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL, NULL, 0);
}
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
execve-must-clear-current-clear_child_tid-v2.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
