+ signals-protect-cinit-from-unblocked-sig_dfl-signals.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     signals: protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     signals-protect-cinit-from-unblocked-sig_dfl-signals.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: signals: protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Drop early any SIG_DFL or SIG_IGN signals to container-init from within
the same container.  But queue SIGSTOP and SIGKILL to the container-init
if they are from an ancestor container.

Blocked, fatal signals (i.e when SIG_DFL is to terminate) from within the
container can still terminate the container-init.  That will be addressed
in the next patch.

Note:	To be bisect-safe, SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will be set for container-inits
   	in a follow-on patch. Until then, this patch is just a preparatory
	step.

Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/signal.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/signal.c~signals-protect-cinit-from-unblocked-sig_dfl-signals kernel/signal.c
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signals-protect-cinit-from-unblocked-sig_dfl-signals
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -55,20 +55,21 @@ static int sig_handler_ignored(void __us
 		(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
-static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig,
+		int from_ancestor_ns)
 {
 	void __user *handler;
 
 	handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
 
 	if (unlikely(t->signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
-			handler == SIG_DFL)
+			handler == SIG_DFL && !from_ancestor_ns)
 		return 1;
 
 	return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
 }
 
-static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, int from_ancestor_ns)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Blocked signals are never ignored, since the
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struc
 	if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig))
+	if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig, from_ancestor_ns))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -634,7 +635,7 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig
  * Returns true if the signal should be actually delivered, otherwise
  * it should be dropped.
  */
-static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p)
+static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int from_ancestor_ns)
 {
 	struct signal_struct *signal = p->signal;
 	struct task_struct *t;
@@ -718,7 +719,7 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struc
 		}
 	}
 
-	return !sig_ignored(p, sig);
+	return !sig_ignored(p, sig, from_ancestor_ns);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -832,7 +833,8 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct
 	trace_sched_signal_send(sig, t);
 
 	assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
-	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t))
+
+	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, from_ancestor_ns))
 		return 0;
 
 	pending = group ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
@@ -902,7 +904,15 @@ out_set:
 static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
 			int group)
 {
-	return __send_signal(sig, info, t, group, 0);
+	int from_ancestor_ns = 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
+	if (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info) &&
+			task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t)) <= 0)
+		from_ancestor_ns = 1;
+#endif
+
+	return __send_signal(sig, info, t, group, from_ancestor_ns);
 }
 
 int print_fatal_signals;
@@ -1336,7 +1346,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
 		goto ret;
 
 	ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
-	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t))
+	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, 0))
 		goto out;
 
 	ret = 0;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

vfs-simple_set_mnt-should-return-void.patch
devpts-must-release-s_umount-on-error.patch
signals-remove-handler-parameter-to-tracehook-functions.patch
signals-protect-init-from-unwanted-signals-more.patch
signals-add-from_ancestor_ns-parameter-to-send_signal.patch
signals-protect-cinit-from-unblocked-sig_dfl-signals.patch
signals-zap_pid_ns_process-should-use-force_sig.patch
signals-protect-cinit-from-blocked-fatal-signals.patch
signals-si_user-masquerade-si_pid-when-crossing-pid-ns-boundary.patch
pids-document-task_pgrp-task_session-is-not-safe-without-tasklist-rcu.patch
pids-document-task_pgrp-task_session-is-not-safe-without-tasklist-rcu-fix.patch
pids-improve-get_task_pid-to-fix-the-unsafe-sys_wait4-task_pgrp.patch
pids-refactor-vnr-nr_ns-helpers-to-make-them-safe.patch
pids-kill-now-unused-signal_struct-__pgrp-__session-and-friends.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux