The patch titled
time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
time-schedc-tick_nohz_update_jiffies-should-be-static.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning
Fixes sparse warning:
kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN kernel/time/tick-sched.c~time-schedc-tick_nohz_update_jiffies-should-be-static kernel/time/tick-sched.c
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c~time-schedc-tick_nohz_update_jiffies-should-be-static
+++ a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
* value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the
* cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep.
*/
-void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
+static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
