The patch titled time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was time-schedc-tick_nohz_update_jiffies-should-be-static.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ Subject: time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning Fixes sparse warning: kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN kernel/time/tick-sched.c~time-schedc-tick_nohz_update_jiffies-should-be-static kernel/time/tick-sched.c --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c~time-schedc-tick_nohz_update_jiffies-should-be-static +++ a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz); * value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the * cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep. */ -void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void) +static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void) { int cpu = smp_processor_id(); struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are linux-next.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html