+ i915-filter-pci-devices-based-on-pci_class_display_vga.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     i915: filter pci devices based on PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     i915-filter-pci-devices-based-on-pci_class_display_vga.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: i915: filter pci devices based on PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA
From: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>

This fixes hangs on 855-class hardware by avoiding double attachment of
the driver due to the stub second head device having the same pci id as
the real device.

Other DRM drivers probably want this treatment as well, but I'm applying
it just to this one for safety.

Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c |   10 ++++++
 include/drm/drm_pciids.h  |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c~i915-filter-pci-devices-based-on-pci_class_display_vga drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c~i915-filter-pci-devices-based-on-pci_class_display_vga
+++ a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
@@ -266,11 +266,19 @@ int drm_init(struct drm_driver *driver)
 	for (i = 0; driver->pci_driver.id_table[i].vendor != 0; i++) {
 		pid = (struct pci_device_id *)&driver->pci_driver.id_table[i];
 
+		/* Loop around setting up a DRM device for each PCI device
+		 * matching our ID and device class.  If we had the internal
+		 * function that pci_get_subsys and pci_get_class used, we'd
+		 * be able to just pass pid in instead of doing a two-stage
+		 * thing.
+		 */
 		pdev = NULL;
-		/* pass back in pdev to account for multiple identical cards */
 		while ((pdev =
 			pci_get_subsys(pid->vendor, pid->device, pid->subvendor,
 				       pid->subdevice, pdev)) != NULL) {
+			if ((pdev->class & pid->class_mask) != pid->class)
+				continue;
+
 			/* stealth mode requires a manual probe */
 			pci_dev_get(pdev);
 			drm_get_dev(pdev, pid, driver);
diff -puN include/drm/drm_pciids.h~i915-filter-pci-devices-based-on-pci_class_display_vga include/drm/drm_pciids.h
--- a/include/drm/drm_pciids.h~i915-filter-pci-devices-based-on-pci_class_display_vga
+++ a/include/drm/drm_pciids.h
@@ -394,28 +394,34 @@
 #define ffb_PCI_IDS \
 	{0, 0, 0}
 
+#define i915_PCI_DEVID(vendor, device) {				\
+	vendor, device,							\
+	PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,						\
+	PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA << 8, 0xffff00,				\
+	0								\
+}
 #define i915_PCI_IDS \
-	{0x8086, 0x3577, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2562, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x3582, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2572, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2582, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x258a, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2592, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2772, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x27a2, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x27ae, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2972, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2982, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2992, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x29a2, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x29b2, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x29c2, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x29d2, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2a02, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2a12, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2a42, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2e02, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2e12, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
-	{0x8086, 0x2e22, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x3577), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2562), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x3582), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2572), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2582), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x258a), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2592), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2772), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x27a2), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x27ae), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2972), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2982), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2992), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x29a2), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x29b2), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x29c2), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x29d2), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2a02), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2a12), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2a42), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2e02), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2e12), \
+	i915_PCI_DEVID(0x8086, 0x2e22), \
 	{0, 0, 0}
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from eric@xxxxxxxxxx are

linux-next.patch
i915-filter-pci-devices-based-on-pci_class_display_vga.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux