The patch titled
linux/ratelimit.h: fixed "missing initializer" warning
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
linux-ratelimith-fixed-missing-initializer-warning.patch
This patch was dropped because it was nacked
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: linux/ratelimit.h: fixed "missing initializer" warning
From: Max Kellermann <mk@xxxxxxxxxx>
When compiled with -Wmissing-field-initializers (-Wextra), gcc complains
that there are uninitialized fields in the struct:
include/linux/ratelimit.h: In function 'ratelimit':
include/linux/ratelimit.h:23: warning: missing initializer
include/linux/ratelimit.h:23: warning: (near initialization for 'rs.printed')
Fix this by using C99 initializers.
Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <mk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/ratelimit.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/ratelimit.h~linux-ratelimith-fixed-missing-initializer-warning include/linux/ratelimit.h
--- a/include/linux/ratelimit.h~linux-ratelimith-fixed-missing-initializer-warning
+++ a/include/linux/ratelimit.h
@@ -13,8 +13,11 @@ struct ratelimit_state {
unsigned long begin;
};
-#define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, interval, burst) \
- struct ratelimit_state name = {interval, burst,}
+#define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, _interval, _burst) \
+ struct ratelimit_state name = { \
+ .interval = _interval, \
+ .burst = _burst, \
+ }
extern int __ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mk@xxxxxxxxxx are
linux-ratelimith-fixed-missing-initializer-warning.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
