The patch titled
more aggressively use lumpy reclaim
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
more-aggressively-use-lumpy-reclaim.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: more aggressively use lumpy reclaim
From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
During an AIM7 run on a 16GB system, fork started failing around 32000
threads, despite the system having plenty of free swap and 15GB of
pageable memory. This was on x86-64, so 8k stacks.
If a higher order allocation fails, we can either:
- keep evicting pages off the end of the LRUs and hope that
we eventually create a contiguous region; this is somewhat
unlikely if the system is under enough stress by new
allocations
- after trying normal eviction for a bit, use lumpy reclaim
This patch switches the system to lumpy reclaim if the VM is having
trouble freeing enough pages, using the same threshold for detection as
used by pageout congestion wait.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~more-aggressively-use-lumpy-reclaim mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~more-aggressively-use-lumpy-reclaim
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -909,7 +909,8 @@ int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
* of reclaimed pages
*/
static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
- struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, int file)
+ struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
+ int priority, int file)
{
LIST_HEAD(page_list);
struct pagevec pvec;
@@ -927,8 +928,19 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
unsigned long nr_freed;
unsigned long nr_active;
unsigned int count[NR_LRU_LISTS] = { 0, };
- int mode = (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ?
- ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE;
+ int mode = ISOLATE_INACTIVE;
+
+ /*
+ * If we need a large contiguous chunk of memory, or have
+ * trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages, we
+ * will reclaim both active and inactive pages.
+ *
+ * We use the same threshold as pageout congestion_wait below.
+ */
+ if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
+ mode = ISOLATE_BOTH;
+ else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
+ mode = ISOLATE_BOTH;
nr_taken = sc->isolate_pages(sc->swap_cluster_max,
&page_list, &nr_scan, sc->order, mode,
@@ -1172,7 +1184,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lr
shrink_active_list(nr_to_scan, zone, sc, priority, file);
return 0;
}
- return shrink_inactive_list(nr_to_scan, zone, sc, file);
+ return shrink_inactive_list(nr_to_scan, zone, sc, priority, file);
}
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from riel@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
