The patch titled gpiolib: request/free hooks has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was gpiolib-request-free-hooks.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ Subject: gpiolib: request/free hooks From: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Add a new internal mechanism to gpiolib to support low power operations by letting gpio_chip instances see when their GPIOs are in use. When no GPIOs are active, chips may be able to enter lower powered runtime states by disabling clocks and/or power domains. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/gpio.txt | 4 + drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 9 +++ 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff -puN Documentation/gpio.txt~gpiolib-request-free-hooks Documentation/gpio.txt --- a/Documentation/gpio.txt~gpiolib-request-free-hooks +++ a/Documentation/gpio.txt @@ -240,6 +240,10 @@ signal, or (b) something wrongly believe needed to manage a signal that's in active use. That is, requesting a GPIO can serve as a kind of lock. +Some platforms may also use knowledge about what GPIOs are active for +power management, such as by powering down unused chip sectors and, more +easily, gating off unused clocks. + These two calls are optional because not not all current Linux platforms offer such functionality in their GPIO support; a valid implementation could return success for all gpio_request() calls. Unlike the other calls, diff -puN drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c~gpiolib-request-free-hooks drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c~gpiolib-request-free-hooks +++ a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -67,17 +67,28 @@ static inline void desc_set_label(struct * when setting direction, and otherwise illegal. Until board setup code * and drivers use explicit requests everywhere (which won't happen when * those calls have no teeth) we can't avoid autorequesting. This nag - * message should motivate switching to explicit requests... + * message should motivate switching to explicit requests... so should + * the weaker cleanup after faults, compared to gpio_request(). */ -static void gpio_ensure_requested(struct gpio_desc *desc) +static int gpio_ensure_requested(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned offset) { if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0) { - pr_warning("GPIO-%d autorequested\n", (int)(desc - gpio_desc)); + struct gpio_chip *chip = desc->chip; + int gpio = chip->base + offset; + + if (!try_module_get(chip->owner)) { + pr_err("GPIO-%d: module can't be gotten \n", gpio); + clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags); + /* lose */ + return -EIO; + } + pr_warning("GPIO-%d autorequested\n", gpio); desc_set_label(desc, "[auto]"); - if (!try_module_get(desc->chip->owner)) - pr_err("GPIO-%d: module can't be gotten \n", - (int)(desc - gpio_desc)); + /* caller must chip->request() w/o spinlock */ + if (chip->request) + return 1; } + return 0; } /* caller holds gpio_lock *OR* gpio is marked as requested */ @@ -752,6 +763,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_remove); int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label) { struct gpio_desc *desc; + struct gpio_chip *chip; int status = -EINVAL; unsigned long flags; @@ -760,14 +772,15 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const ch if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) goto done; desc = &gpio_desc[gpio]; - if (desc->chip == NULL) + chip = desc->chip; + if (chip == NULL) goto done; - if (!try_module_get(desc->chip->owner)) + if (!try_module_get(chip->owner)) goto done; /* NOTE: gpio_request() can be called in early boot, - * before IRQs are enabled. + * before IRQs are enabled, for non-sleeping (SOC) GPIOs. */ if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0) { @@ -775,7 +788,20 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const ch status = 0; } else { status = -EBUSY; - module_put(desc->chip->owner); + module_put(chip->owner); + } + + if (chip->request) { + /* chip->request may sleep */ + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); + status = chip->request(chip, gpio - chip->base); + spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); + + if (status < 0) { + desc_set_label(desc, NULL); + module_put(chip->owner); + clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags); + } } done: @@ -791,6 +817,7 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio) { unsigned long flags; struct gpio_desc *desc; + struct gpio_chip *chip; might_sleep(); @@ -804,9 +831,17 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio) spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); desc = &gpio_desc[gpio]; - if (desc->chip && test_and_clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)) { + chip = desc->chip; + if (chip && test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)) { + if (chip->free) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); + might_sleep_if(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep); + chip->free(chip, gpio - chip->base); + spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); + } desc_set_label(desc, NULL); module_put(desc->chip->owner); + clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags); } else WARN_ON(extra_checks); @@ -871,7 +906,9 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio) gpio -= chip->base; if (gpio >= chip->ngpio) goto fail; - gpio_ensure_requested(desc); + status = gpio_ensure_requested(desc, gpio); + if (status < 0) + goto fail; /* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */ @@ -879,9 +916,22 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio) might_sleep_if(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep); + if (status) { + status = chip->request(chip, gpio); + if (status < 0) { + pr_debug("GPIO-%d: chip request fail, %d\n", + chip->base + gpio, status); + /* and it's not available to anyone else ... + * gpio_request() is the fully clean solution. + */ + goto lose; + } + } + status = chip->direction_input(chip, gpio); if (status == 0) clear_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags); +lose: return status; fail: spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); @@ -909,7 +959,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, gpio -= chip->base; if (gpio >= chip->ngpio) goto fail; - gpio_ensure_requested(desc); + status = gpio_ensure_requested(desc, gpio); + if (status < 0) + goto fail; /* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */ @@ -917,9 +969,22 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, might_sleep_if(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep); + if (status) { + status = chip->request(chip, gpio); + if (status < 0) { + pr_debug("GPIO-%d: chip request fail, %d\n", + chip->base + gpio, status); + /* and it's not available to anyone else ... + * gpio_request() is the fully clean solution. + */ + goto lose; + } + } + status = chip->direction_output(chip, gpio, value); if (status == 0) set_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags); +lose: return status; fail: spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); diff -puN include/asm-generic/gpio.h~gpiolib-request-free-hooks include/asm-generic/gpio.h --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h~gpiolib-request-free-hooks +++ a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ struct module; * @label: for diagnostics * @dev: optional device providing the GPIOs * @owner: helps prevent removal of modules exporting active GPIOs + * @request: optional hook for chip-specific activation, such as + * enabling module power and clock; may sleep + * @free: optional hook for chip-specific deactivation, such as + * disabling module power and clock; may sleep * @direction_input: configures signal "offset" as input, or returns error * @get: returns value for signal "offset"; for output signals this * returns either the value actually sensed, or zero @@ -67,6 +71,11 @@ struct gpio_chip { struct device *dev; struct module *owner; + int (*request)(struct gpio_chip *chip, + unsigned offset); + void (*free)(struct gpio_chip *chip, + unsigned offset); + int (*direction_input)(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset); int (*get)(struct gpio_chip *chip, _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch rtc-cmos-export-second-nvram-bank.patch gpio-modify-sysfs-gpio-export-so-that-value-displays-as-0-or-1.patch gpiolib-fix-oops-in-gpio_get_value_cansleep.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html