- acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     acpi_pm.c: check for monotonicity
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity.patch

This patch was dropped because it had testing failures

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: acpi_pm.c: check for monotonicity
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The current check for monotonicity is way too weak: Andreas Mohr reports (
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/77 ) that on one of his test systems the
current check only triggers in 50% of all cases, leading to catastrophic
timer behaviour.  To fix this issue, expand the check for monotonicity by
doing ten consecutive tests instead of one.

Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andreas Mohr <andi@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c |   42 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c~acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
--- a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c~acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity
+++ a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int verify_pmtmr_rate(void)
 static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksource(void)
 {
 	cycle_t value1, value2;
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int i, j, good = 0;
 
 	if (!pmtmr_ioport)
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -187,24 +187,32 @@ static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksour
 						clocksource_acpi_pm.shift);
 
 	/* "verify" this timing source: */
-	value1 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
-	for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
-		value2 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
-		if (value2 == value1)
-			continue;
-		if (value2 > value1)
-			goto pm_good;
-		if ((value2 < value1) && ((value2) < 0xFFF))
-			goto pm_good;
-		printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had inconsistent results:"
-			" 0x%#llx, 0x%#llx - aborting.\n", value1, value2);
-		return -EINVAL;
+	for (j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
+		value1 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
+		for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
+			value2 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
+			if (value2 == value1)
+				continue;
+			if (value2 > value1)
+				good++;
+				break;
+			if ((value2 < value1) && ((value2) < 0xFFF))
+				good++;
+				break;
+			printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had inconsistent results:"
+			       " 0x%#llx, 0x%#llx - aborting.\n",
+			       value1, value2);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		udelay(300 * i);
+	}
+
+	if (good != 10) {
+		printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had no reasonable result:"
+		       " 0x%#llx - aborting.\n", value1);
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
-	printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had no reasonable result:"
-			" 0x%#llx - aborting.\n", value1);
-	return -ENODEV;
 
-pm_good:
 	if (verify_pmtmr_rate() != 0)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

linux-next.patch
pcmcia-pccard-deadlock-fix.patch
acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity.patch
acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity-cleanup.patch
make-sure-nobodys-leaking-resources.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux