The patch titled spi: bugfix spi_add_device() with duplicate chipselects has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was spi-bugfix-spi_add_device-with-duplicate-chipselects.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ Subject: spi: bugfix spi_add_device() with duplicate chipselects From: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> When reviewing a recent patch I noticed a potential trouble spot in the registration of new SPI devices. The SPI master driver is told to set the device up before adding it to the driver model, so that it's always properly set up when probe() is called. (This is important, because in the case of inverted chipselects, this device can make the bus misbehave until it's properly deselected. It's got to be set up even if no driver binds to the device.) The trouble spot is that it doesn't first verify that no other device has been added using that chipselect. If such a device has been added, its configuration gets trashed. (Fortunately this has not been a common error!) The fix here adds an explicit check, and a mutex to protect the relevant critical region. [akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: make the lock local to spi_add_device()] Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/spi/spi.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff -puN drivers/spi/spi.c~spi-bugfix-spi_add_device-with-duplicate-chipselects drivers/spi/spi.c --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c~spi-bugfix-spi_add_device-with-duplicate-chipselects +++ a/drivers/spi/spi.c @@ -226,10 +226,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_alloc_device); * Companion function to spi_alloc_device. Devices allocated with * spi_alloc_device can be added onto the spi bus with this function. * - * Returns 0 on success; non-zero on failure + * Returns 0 on success; negative errno on failure */ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi) { + static DEFINE_MUTEX(spi_add_lock); struct device *dev = spi->master->dev.parent; int status; @@ -246,26 +247,43 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *sp "%s.%u", spi->master->dev.bus_id, spi->chip_select); - /* drivers may modify this initial i/o setup */ + + /* We need to make sure there's no other device with this + * chipselect **BEFORE** we call setup(), else we'll trash + * its configuration. Lock against concurrent add() calls. + */ + mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock); + + if (bus_find_device_by_name(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi->dev.bus_id) + != NULL) { + dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n", + spi->chip_select); + status = -EBUSY; + goto done; + } + + /* Drivers may modify this initial i/o setup, but will + * normally rely on the device being setup. Devices + * using SPI_CS_HIGH can't coexist well otherwise... + */ status = spi->master->setup(spi); if (status < 0) { dev_err(dev, "can't %s %s, status %d\n", "setup", spi->dev.bus_id, status); - return status; + goto done; } - /* driver core catches callers that misbehave by defining - * devices that already exist. - */ + /* Device may be bound to an active driver when this returns */ status = device_add(&spi->dev); - if (status < 0) { + if (status < 0) dev_err(dev, "can't %s %s, status %d\n", "add", spi->dev.bus_id, status); - return status; - } + else + dev_dbg(dev, "registered child %s\n", spi->dev.bus_id); - dev_dbg(dev, "registered child %s\n", spi->dev.bus_id); - return 0; +done: + mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock); + return status; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_add_device); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch linux-next.patch rtc-ds1307-alarm-support-for-ds1337-ds1339.patch rtc-remove-some-nop-open-release-methods.patch legacy-rtc-remove-needless-confusing-hpet_rtc_irq-option.patch rtc-file-close-consistently-disables-repeating-irqs.patch irq-warn-about-irqf_disabledirqf_shared.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html