- markers-fix-markers-read-barrier-for-multiple-probes.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     markers: fix markers read barrier for multiple probes
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     markers-fix-markers-read-barrier-for-multiple-probes.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: markers: fix markers read barrier for multiple probes
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Paul pointed out two incorrect read barriers in the marker handler code in
the path where multiple probes are connected.  Those are ordering reads of
"ptype" (single or multi probe marker), "multi" array pointer, and "multi"
array data access.

It should be ordered like this :

read ptype
smp_rmb()
read multi array pointer
smp_read_barrier_depends()
access data referenced by multi array pointer

The code with a single probe connected (optimized case, does not have to
allocate an array) has correct memory ordering.

It applies to kernel 2.6.26.x, 2.6.25.x and linux-next.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>		[2.6.25.x, 2.6.26.x]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/marker.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/marker.c~markers-fix-markers-read-barrier-for-multiple-probes kernel/marker.c
--- a/kernel/marker.c~markers-fix-markers-read-barrier-for-multiple-probes
+++ a/kernel/marker.c
@@ -126,6 +126,11 @@ void marker_probe_cb(const struct marker
 		struct marker_probe_closure *multi;
 		int i;
 		/*
+		 * Read mdata->ptype before mdata->multi.
+		 */
+		smp_rmb();
+		multi = mdata->multi;
+		/*
 		 * multi points to an array, therefore accessing the array
 		 * depends on reading multi. However, even in this case,
 		 * we must insure that the pointer is read _before_ the array
@@ -133,7 +138,6 @@ void marker_probe_cb(const struct marker
 		 * in the fast path, so put the explicit barrier here.
 		 */
 		smp_read_barrier_depends();
-		multi = mdata->multi;
 		for (i = 0; multi[i].func; i++) {
 			va_start(args, call_private);
 			multi[i].func(multi[i].probe_private, call_private,
@@ -175,6 +179,11 @@ void marker_probe_cb_noarg(const struct 
 		struct marker_probe_closure *multi;
 		int i;
 		/*
+		 * Read mdata->ptype before mdata->multi.
+		 */
+		smp_rmb();
+		multi = mdata->multi;
+		/*
 		 * multi points to an array, therefore accessing the array
 		 * depends on reading multi. However, even in this case,
 		 * we must insure that the pointer is read _before_ the array
@@ -182,7 +191,6 @@ void marker_probe_cb_noarg(const struct 
 		 * in the fast path, so put the explicit barrier here.
 		 */
 		smp_read_barrier_depends();
-		multi = mdata->multi;
 		for (i = 0; multi[i].func; i++)
 			multi[i].func(multi[i].probe_private, call_private,
 				mdata->format, &args);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux