+ blackfin-rtc-driver-if-we-dont-define-irq_set_freq-the-common-rtc-dev-layer-will-give-us-the-same-behavior-of-returning-enotty.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     blackfin RTC driver: if we dont define irq_set_freq, the common rtc-dev layer will give us the same behavior of returning ENOTTY
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     blackfin-rtc-driver-if-we-dont-define-irq_set_freq-the-common-rtc-dev-layer-will-give-us-the-same-behavior-of-returning-enotty.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: blackfin RTC driver: if we dont define irq_set_freq, the common rtc-dev layer will give us the same behavior of returning ENOTTY
From: Mike Frysinger <michael.frysinger@xxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <michael.frysinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c |   15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c~blackfin-rtc-driver-if-we-dont-define-irq_set_freq-the-common-rtc-dev-layer-will-give-us-the-same-behavior-of-returning-enotty drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c~blackfin-rtc-driver-if-we-dont-define-irq_set_freq-the-common-rtc-dev-layer-will-give-us-the-same-behavior-of-returning-enotty
+++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bfin.c
@@ -381,20 +381,6 @@ static int bfin_rtc_proc(struct device *
 #undef yesno
 }
 
-/**
- *	bfin_irq_set_freq - make sure hardware supports requested freq
- *	@dev: pointer to RTC device structure
- *	@freq: requested frequency rate
- *
- *	The Blackfin RTC can only generate periodic events at 1 per
- *	second (1 Hz), so reject any attempt at changing it.
- */
-static int bfin_irq_set_freq(struct device *dev, int freq)
-{
-	dev_dbg_stamp(dev);
-	return -ENOTTY;
-}
-
 static struct rtc_class_ops bfin_rtc_ops = {
 	.open          = bfin_rtc_open,
 	.release       = bfin_rtc_release,
@@ -404,7 +390,6 @@ static struct rtc_class_ops bfin_rtc_ops
 	.read_alarm    = bfin_rtc_read_alarm,
 	.set_alarm     = bfin_rtc_set_alarm,
 	.proc          = bfin_rtc_proc,
-	.irq_set_freq  = bfin_irq_set_freq,
 };
 
 static int __devinit bfin_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from michael.frysinger@xxxxxxxxxx are

blackfin-rtc-driver-if-we-dont-define-irq_set_freq-the-common-rtc-dev-layer-will-give-us-the-same-behavior-of-returning-enotty.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux