The patch titled coredump: zap_threads: comments && use while_each_thread() has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was coredump-zap_threads-comments-use-while_each_thread.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ Subject: coredump: zap_threads: comments && use while_each_thread() From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> No changes in fs/exec.o The for_each_process() loop in zap_threads() is very subtle, it is not clear why we don't race with fork/exit/exec. Add the fat comment. Also, change the code to use while_each_thread(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/exec.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff -puN fs/exec.c~coredump-zap_threads-comments-use-while_each_thread fs/exec.c --- a/fs/exec.c~coredump-zap_threads-comments-use-while_each_thread +++ a/fs/exec.c @@ -1517,7 +1517,7 @@ static void zap_process(struct task_stru sigaddset(&t->pending.signal, SIGKILL); signal_wake_up(t, 1); } - } while ((t = next_thread(t)) != start); + } while_each_thread(start, t); } static inline int zap_threads(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm, @@ -1539,7 +1539,36 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct tas if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == mm->core_waiters + 1) goto done; - + /* + * We should find and kill all tasks which use this mm, and we should + * count them correctly into mm->core_waiters. We don't take tasklist + * lock, but this is safe wrt: + * + * fork: + * None of sub-threads can fork after zap_process(leader). All + * processes which were created before this point should be + * visible to zap_threads() because copy_process() adds the new + * process to the tail of init_task.tasks list, and lock/unlock + * of ->siglock provides a memory barrier. + * + * do_exit: + * The caller holds mm->mmap_sem. This means that the task which + * uses this mm can't pass exit_mm(), so it can't exit or clear + * its ->mm. + * + * de_thread: + * It does list_replace_rcu(&leader->tasks, ¤t->tasks), + * we must see either old or new leader, this does not matter. + * However, it can change p->sighand, so lock_task_sighand(p) + * must be used. Since p->mm != NULL and we hold ->mmap_sem + * it can't fail. + * + * Note also that "g" can be the old leader with ->mm == NULL + * and already unhashed and thus removed from ->thread_group. + * This is OK, __unhash_process()->list_del_rcu() does not + * clear the ->next pointer, we will find the new leader via + * next_thread(). + */ rcu_read_lock(); for_each_process(g) { if (g == tsk->group_leader) @@ -1549,17 +1578,13 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct tas do { if (p->mm) { if (p->mm == mm) { - /* - * p->sighand can't disappear, but - * may be changed by de_thread() - */ lock_task_sighand(p, &flags); zap_process(p); unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags); } break; } - } while ((p = next_thread(p)) != g); + } while_each_thread(g, p); } rcu_read_unlock(); done: _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@xxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch linux-next.patch migrate_timers-add-comment-use-spinlock_irq.patch tracehook-add-linux-tracehookh.patch tracehook-exec.patch tracehook-unexport-ptrace_notify.patch tracehook-exit.patch tracehook-clone.patch tracehook-vfork-done.patch tracehook-release_task.patch tracehook-tracehook_tracer_task.patch tracehook-tracehook_expect_breakpoints.patch tracehook-tracehook_signal_handler.patch tracehook-tracehook_consider_ignored_signal.patch tracehook-tracehook_consider_fatal_signal.patch tracehook-syscall.patch tracehook-get_signal_to_deliver.patch tracehook-job-control.patch tracehook-death.patch tracehook-force-signal_pending.patch tracehook-tif_notify_resume.patch tracehook-asm-syscallh.patch tracehook-config_have_arch_tracehook.patch tracehook-wait_task_inactive.patch task_current_syscall.patch proc-pid-syscall.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html