The patch titled
Intel IOMMU: RMRRs do not necessarily have to be present on all VT-d capable platforms
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
intel-iommu-rmrrs-do-not-necessarily-have-to-be-present-on-all-vt-d-capable-platforms.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Intel IOMMU: RMRRs do not necessarily have to be present on all VT-d capable platforms
From: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RMRRs do not necessarily have to be present on all VT-d capable platforms.
The printk is just informational and does not need to be followed by an error
return.
Signed-off-by: Yong Y Wang <yong.y.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Keshavamurthy, Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/dmar.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/pci/dmar.c~intel-iommu-rmrrs-do-not-necessarily-have-to-be-present-on-all-vt-d-capable-platforms drivers/pci/dmar.c
--- a/drivers/pci/dmar.c~intel-iommu-rmrrs-do-not-necessarily-have-to-be-present-on-all-vt-d-capable-platforms
+++ a/drivers/pci/dmar.c
@@ -317,10 +317,8 @@ int __init dmar_table_init(void)
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (list_empty(&dmar_rmrr_units)) {
+ if (list_empty(&dmar_rmrr_units))
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "No RMRR found\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
return 0;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yong.y.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
