- md-do-not-compute-parity-unless-it-is-on-a-failed-drive.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     md: do not compute parity unless it is on a failed drive
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     md-do-not-compute-parity-unless-it-is-on-a-failed-drive.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: md: do not compute parity unless it is on a failed drive
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>

If a block is computed (rather than read) then a check/repair operation
may be lead to believe that the data on disk is correct, when infact it
isn't.  So only compute blocks for failed devices.

This issue has been around since at least 2.6.12, but has become harder to
hit in recent kernels since most reads bypass the cache.

echo repair > /sys/block/mdN/md/sync_action will set the parity blocks to the
correct state.

Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/md/raid5.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN drivers/md/raid5.c~md-do-not-compute-parity-unless-it-is-on-a-failed-drive drivers/md/raid5.c
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c~md-do-not-compute-parity-unless-it-is-on-a-failed-drive
+++ a/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2002,6 +2002,7 @@ static int __handle_issuing_new_read_req
 		 * have quiesced.
 		 */
 		if ((s->uptodate == disks - 1) &&
+		    (s->failed && disk_idx == s->failed_num) &&
 		    !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK, &sh->ops.pending)) {
 			set_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK, &sh->ops.pending);
 			set_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags);
@@ -2087,7 +2088,9 @@ static void handle_issuing_new_read_requ
 			/* we would like to get this block, possibly
 			 * by computing it, but we might not be able to
 			 */
-			if (s->uptodate == disks-1) {
+			if ((s->uptodate == disks - 1) &&
+			    (s->failed && (i == r6s->failed_num[0] ||
+					   i == r6s->failed_num[1]))) {
 				pr_debug("Computing stripe %llu block %d\n",
 				       (unsigned long long)sh->sector, i);
 				compute_block_1(sh, i, 0);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch
arm-fix-header-guards.patch
fsldma-the-mpc8377mds-board-device-tree-node-for-fsldma-driver.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux