- signals-introduce-sigqueue_cancelled.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     signals: introduce SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     signals-introduce-sigqueue_cancelled.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: signals: introduce SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Suggested by Linus Torvalds.

Introduce SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED flag.  If it is set, the pending signal
should be ignored and collect_signal() should return 0.

Note that the new flag is completely orthogonal to SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC, and it
can be set without ->siglock held.

No users of this new flag yet, see the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/signal.h |    1 +
 kernel/signal.c        |   13 +++++++------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/signal.h~signals-introduce-sigqueue_cancelled include/linux/signal.h
--- a/include/linux/signal.h~signals-introduce-sigqueue_cancelled
+++ a/include/linux/signal.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct sigqueue {
 
 /* flags values. */
 #define SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC	1
+#define SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED	2
 
 struct sigpending {
 	struct list_head list;
diff -puN kernel/signal.c~signals-introduce-sigqueue_cancelled kernel/signal.c
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signals-introduce-sigqueue_cancelled
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -326,11 +326,13 @@ static int collect_signal(int sig, struc
 		}
 	}
 	if (first) {
-		list_del_init(&first->list);
-		copy_siginfo(info, &first->info);
-		__sigqueue_free(first);
 		if (!still_pending)
 			sigdelset(&list->signal, sig);
+		if (unlikely(first->flags & SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED))
+			sig = 0;
+		copy_siginfo(info, &first->info);
+		list_del_init(&first->list);
+		__sigqueue_free(first);
 	} else {
 
 		/* Ok, it wasn't in the queue.  This must be
@@ -344,7 +346,7 @@ static int collect_signal(int sig, struc
 		info->si_pid = 0;
 		info->si_uid = 0;
 	}
-	return 1;
+	return sig;
 }
 
 static int __dequeue_signal(struct sigpending *pending, sigset_t *mask,
@@ -362,8 +364,7 @@ static int __dequeue_signal(struct sigpe
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (!collect_signal(sig, pending, info))
-			sig = 0;
+		sig = collect_signal(sig, pending, info);
 	}
 
 	return sig;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@xxxxxxxxxx are

signals-fix-sigqueue_free-vs-__exit_signal-race.patch
uml-activate_mm-remove-the-dead-pf_borrowed_mm-check.patch
posix-timers-timer_delete-remove-the-bogus-it_process-=-null-check.patch
posix-timers-release_posix_timer-kill-the-bogus-put_task_struct-it_process.patch
signals-introduce-sigqueue_cancelled.patch
posix-timers-use-sigqueue_cancelled-when-the-timer-is-destroyed.patch
signals-collect_signal-remove-the-unneeded-sigismember-check.patch
signals-collect_signal-simplify-the-still_pending-logic.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux