The patch titled
net/ipv4: correct RFC 1122 section reference in comment
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
net-ipv4-correct-rfc-1122-section-reference-in-comment.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: net/ipv4: correct RFC 1122 section reference in comment
From: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <jdassen@xxxxxxxxxx>
RFC 1122 does not have a section 3.1.2.2. The requirement to silently
discard datagrams with a bad checksum is in section 3.2.1.2 instead.
Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10611
Signed-off-by: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <jdassen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/ip_input.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN net/ipv4/ip_input.c~net-ipv4-correct-rfc-1122-section-reference-in-comment net/ipv4/ip_input.c
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c~net-ipv4-correct-rfc-1122-section-reference-in-comment
+++ a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct n
iph = ip_hdr(skb);
/*
- * RFC1122: 3.1.2.2 MUST silently discard any IP frame that fails the checksum.
+ * RFC1122: 3.2.1.2 MUST silently discard any IP frame that fails the checksum.
*
* Is the datagram acceptable?
*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jdassen@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
