+ uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     uml: track and make up lost ticks
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: uml: track and make up lost ticks
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Alarm delivery could be noticably late in the !CONFIG_NOHZ case
because lost ticks weren't being taken into account.  This is now
treated more carefully, with the time between ticks being calculated
and the appropriate number of ticks delivered to the timekeeping system.

Cc: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/um/os-Linux/time.c |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/um/os-Linux/time.c~uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks arch/um/os-Linux/time.c
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c~uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks
+++ a/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
 #include <time.h>
 #include <sys/time.h>
 #include "kern_constants.h"
+#include "kern_util.h"
 #include "os.h"
+#include "process.h"
 #include "user.h"
 
 int set_interval(void)
@@ -58,12 +60,17 @@ static inline long long timeval_to_ns(co
 long long disable_timer(void)
 {
 	struct itimerval time = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, 0 }, { 0, 0 } });
+	int remain, max = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
 
 	if (setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &time, &time) < 0)
 		printk(UM_KERN_ERR "disable_timer - setitimer failed, "
 		       "errno = %d\n", errno);
 
-	return timeval_to_ns(&time.it_value);
+	remain = timeval_to_ns(&time.it_value);
+	if (remain > max)
+		remain = max;
+
+	return remain;
 }
 
 long long os_nsecs(void)
@@ -79,7 +86,44 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static void deliver_alarm(void)
+{
+	alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+}
+
+static unsigned long long sleep_time(unsigned long long nsecs)
+{
+	return nsecs;
+}
+
 #else
+unsigned long long last_tick;
+unsigned long long skew;
+
+static void deliver_alarm(void)
+{
+	unsigned long long this_tick = os_nsecs();
+	int one_tick = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+
+	if (last_tick == 0)
+		last_tick = this_tick - one_tick;
+
+	skew += this_tick - last_tick;
+
+	while (skew >= one_tick) {
+		alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+		skew -= one_tick;
+	}
+
+	last_tick = this_tick;
+}
+
+static unsigned long long sleep_time(unsigned long long nsecs)
+{
+	return nsecs > skew ? nsecs - skew : 0;
+}
+
 static inline long long timespec_to_us(const struct timespec *ts)
 {
 	return ((long long) ts->tv_sec * UM_USEC_PER_SEC) +
@@ -102,6 +146,8 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
 	 */
 	if (start_usecs > usec)
 		start_usecs = usec;
+
+	start_usecs -= skew / UM_NSEC_PER_USEC;
 	tv = ((struct timeval) { .tv_sec  = start_usecs / UM_USEC_PER_SEC,
 				 .tv_usec = start_usecs % UM_USEC_PER_SEC });
 	interval = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, usec }, tv });
@@ -113,8 +159,6 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
 }
 #endif
 
-extern void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc);
-
 void idle_sleep(unsigned long long nsecs)
 {
 	struct timespec ts;
@@ -126,10 +170,12 @@ void idle_sleep(unsigned long long nsecs
 	 */
 	if (nsecs == 0)
 		nsecs = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+
+	nsecs = sleep_time(nsecs);
 	ts = ((struct timespec) { .tv_sec	= nsecs / UM_NSEC_PER_SEC,
 				  .tv_nsec	= nsecs % UM_NSEC_PER_SEC });
 
 	if (nanosleep(&ts, &ts) == 0)
-		alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+		deliver_alarm();
 	after_sleep_interval(&ts);
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx are

linux-next.patch
uml-fix-inconsistence-due-to-tty_operation-change.patch
uml-redo-host-capability-detection-and-disabling.patch
uml-tidy-stub-management-code.patch
uml-style-fixes.patch
uml-random-driver-fixes.patch
uml-random-driver-style-fixes.patch
uml-hppfs-fixes.patch
uml-move-hppfs_kernc-to-hppfsc.patch
uml-tidy-ptrace-interface.patch
uml-fix-errno-return.patch
uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks.patch
uml-fix-build-when-slob-is-enabled.patch
uml-remove-unused-header.patch
uml-fix-bad-ntp-interaction-with-clock.patch
uml-use-__spin_lock_unlocked.patch
uml-physical-memory-shouldnt-include-initial-stack.patch
arch-um-kernel-irqc-clean-up-some-functions.patch
arch-um-kernel-memc-remove-arch_validate.patch
uml-make-several-more-things-static.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux