The patch titled
scsi_scan: WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:431 blk_queue_init_tags+0x107/0x120()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
scsi_scan-warning-at-include-linux-blkdevh-431-blk_queue_init_tags0x107-0x120.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: scsi_scan: WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:431 blk_queue_init_tags+0x107/0x120()
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 2 May 2008 00:43:30 +0200 (CEST)
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For your information;
>
> I just build and booted the tip of Linus' git tree (HEAD at
> 886c35fbcf6fb2eee15687efc2d64d99b6ad9a4a) and got this in dmesg during
> bootup :
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:431 blk_queue_init_tags+0x107/0x120()
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 432, comm: scsi_scan_0 Not tainted 2.6.25-07351-g886c35f #1
> [<c0129684>] warn_on_slowpath+0x54/0x70
> [<c017a7c3>] ? check_object+0xe3/0x1f0
> [<c0200ae9>] ? init_tag_map+0x59/0xb0
> [<c014b1e7>] ? mark_held_locks+0x47/0x80
> [<c017cbeb>] ? __kmalloc+0x6b/0x100
> [<c014b379>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x150
> [<c0200ae9>] ? init_tag_map+0x59/0xb0
> [<c0200ae9>] ? init_tag_map+0x59/0xb0
> [<c0200ae9>] ? init_tag_map+0x59/0xb0
> [<c0200c34>] ? __blk_queue_init_tags+0x24/0x70
> [<c0200c45>] ? __blk_queue_init_tags+0x35/0x70
> [<c0200e57>] blk_queue_init_tags+0x107/0x120
> [<c02b5a91>] ahc_platform_set_tags+0x191/0x1d0
> [<c02b5bd3>] ahc_linux_slave_configure+0x103/0x170
> [<c02a1f65>] scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x6e5/0x920
> [<c02a2468>] __scsi_scan_target+0xe8/0x5d0
> [<c0108e17>] ? native_sched_clock+0x87/0xd0
> [<c0148c89>] ? get_lock_stats+0x29/0x50
> [<c0148cbd>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x30
> [<c014b1e7>] ? mark_held_locks+0x47/0x80
> [<c035e247>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b7/0x2a0
> [<c014b379>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x150
> [<c035e23a>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1aa/0x2a0
> [<c02a2a1a>] ? scsi_scan_host_selected+0x3a/0xf0
> [<c02a29c0>] scsi_scan_channel+0x70/0x90
> [<c02a2a9d>] scsi_scan_host_selected+0xbd/0xf0
> [<c02a2b50>] ? do_scan_async+0x0/0x140
> [<c02a2b48>] do_scsi_scan_host+0x78/0x80
> [<c02a2b64>] do_scan_async+0x14/0x140
> [<c011f6e8>] ? complete+0x48/0x60
> [<c02a2b50>] ? do_scan_async+0x0/0x140
> [<c013c8d2>] kthread+0x42/0x70
> [<c013c890>] ? kthread+0x0/0x70
> [<c0103ceb>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x1c
The problem is that the commit 75ad23b expects that we hold the queue
lock for __blk_queue_free_tags, blk_queue_free_tags and
blk_queue_init_tags but we haven't.
The simple fix is using queue_flag_set/clear_unlocked for them, then
it should work as before. However, it would be better to hold the
queue lock for blk_queue_free_tags and blk_queue_init_tags (we can
hold the queue lock in scsi_activate_tcq and scsi_deactivate_tcq).
(akpm: queued this up assuming that a final/formal version will be
forthcoming?)
Tested-by: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-tag.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN block/blk-tag.c~scsi_scan-warning-at-include-linux-blkdevh-431-blk_queue_init_tags0x107-0x120 block/blk-tag.c
--- a/block/blk-tag.c~scsi_scan-warning-at-include-linux-blkdevh-431-blk_queue_init_tags0x107-0x120
+++ a/block/blk-tag.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void __blk_queue_free_tags(struct reques
__blk_free_tags(bqt);
q->queue_tags = NULL;
- queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, q);
+ queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, q);
}
/**
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_free_tags);
**/
void blk_queue_free_tags(struct request_queue *q)
{
- queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, q);
+ queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, q);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_free_tags);
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ int blk_queue_init_tags(struct request_q
* assign it, all done
*/
q->queue_tags = tags;
- queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, q);
+ queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, q);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_busy_list);
return 0;
fail:
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
scsi_scan-warning-at-include-linux-blkdevh-431-blk_queue_init_tags0x107-0x120.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
