The patch titled
rcu: add memory barriers and comments to rcu_check_callbacks()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
rcu-add-memory-barriers-and-comments-to-rcu_check_callbacks.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: rcu: add memory barriers and comments to rcu_check_callbacks()
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add comments to the logic that infers quiescent states when interrupting from
either user mode or the idle loop. Also add a memory barrier: it appears that
James Huang was in fact onto something, as the scheduler is much less
synchronization happy than it once was, so we can no longer rely on its memory
barriers in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: James Huang <jamesclhuang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcuclassic.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-add-memory-barriers-and-comments-to-rcu_check_callbacks kernel/rcuclassic.c
--- a/kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-add-memory-barriers-and-comments-to-rcu_check_callbacks
+++ a/kernel/rcuclassic.c
@@ -502,10 +502,38 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int us
if (user ||
(idle_cpu(cpu) && !in_softirq() &&
hardirq_count() <= (1 << HARDIRQ_SHIFT))) {
+
+ /*
+ * Get here if this CPU took its interrupt from user
+ * mode or from the idle loop, and if this is not a
+ * nested interrupt. In this case, the CPU is in
+ * a quiescent state, so count it.
+ *
+ * Also do a memory barrier. This is needed to handle
+ * the case where writes from a preempt-disable section
+ * of code get reordered into schedule() by this CPU's
+ * write buffer. The memory barrier makes sure that
+ * the rcu_qsctr_inc() and rcu_bh_qsctr_inc() are see
+ * by other CPUs to happen after any such write.
+ */
+
+ smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */
rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu);
rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
- } else if (!in_softirq())
+
+ } else if (!in_softirq()) {
+
+ /*
+ * Get here if this CPU did not take its interrupt from
+ * softirq, in other words, if it is not interrupting
+ * a rcu_bh read-side critical section. This is an _bh
+ * critical section, so count it. The memory barrier
+ * is needed for the same reason as is the above one.
+ */
+
+ smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */
rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
+ }
raise_rcu_softirq();
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
add-rcu_assign_index-if-ever-needed.patch
rcu-fix-rcu_try_flip_waitack_needed-to-prevent-grace-period-stall.patch
add-warn_on_secs-macro.patch
use-warn_on_secs-in-rcupreempth.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
