- signals-do_tkill-dont-use-tasklist_lock.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     signals: do_tkill: don't use tasklist_lock
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     signals-do_tkill-dont-use-tasklist_lock.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: signals: do_tkill: don't use tasklist_lock
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Convert do_tkill() to use rcu_read_lock() + lock_task_sighand() to avoid
taking tasklist lock.

Note that we don't return an error if lock_task_sighand() fails, we pretend
the task dies after receiving the signal.  Otherwise, we should fight with the
nasty races with mt-exec without having any advantage.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/signal.c |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/signal.c~signals-do_tkill-dont-use-tasklist_lock kernel/signal.c
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signals-do_tkill-dont-use-tasklist_lock
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2219,6 +2219,7 @@ static int do_tkill(int tgid, int pid, i
 	int error;
 	struct siginfo info;
 	struct task_struct *p;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	error = -ESRCH;
 	info.si_signo = sig;
@@ -2227,21 +2228,24 @@ static int do_tkill(int tgid, int pid, i
 	info.si_pid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
 	info.si_uid = current->uid;
 
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
 	if (p && (tgid <= 0 || task_tgid_vnr(p) == tgid)) {
 		error = check_kill_permission(sig, &info, p);
 		/*
 		 * The null signal is a permissions and process existence
 		 * probe.  No signal is actually delivered.
+		 *
+		 * If lock_task_sighand() fails we pretend the task dies
+		 * after receiving the signal. The window is tiny, and the
+		 * signal is private anyway.
 		 */
-		if (!error && sig && p->sighand) {
-			spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
+		if (!error && sig && lock_task_sighand(p, &flags)) {
 			error = specific_send_sig_info(sig, &info, p);
-			spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
+			unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
 		}
 	}
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return error;
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@xxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
posix-timers-bug-10460-discard-the-pending-signal-when-the-timer-is-destroyed.patch
workqueue-remove-redundant-function-invocation.patch
put_pid-make-sure-we-dont-free-the-live-pid.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux