The patch titled gpiolib: better rmmod infrastructure has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was gpiolib-better-rmmod-infrastructure.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ Subject: gpiolib: better rmmod infrastructure From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> As long as one or more GPIOs on a gpio chip are used its driver should not be unloaded. The existing mechanism (gpiochip_remove failure) doesn't address that, since rmmod can no longer be made to fail by having the cleanup code report errors. Module usecounts are the solution. Assuming standard "initialize struct to zero" policies, this change won't affect SOC platform drivers. However, drivers for external chips (on I2C and SPI busses) should be updated if they can be built as modules. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ gpio_ensure_requested() needs to update module usecounts too ] Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff -puN drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c~gpiolib-better-rmmod-infrastructure drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c~gpiolib-better-rmmod-infrastructure +++ a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ static void gpio_ensure_requested(struct if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0) { pr_warning("GPIO-%d autorequested\n", (int)(desc - gpio_desc)); desc_set_label(desc, "[auto]"); + if (!try_module_get(desc->chip->owner)) + pr_err("GPIO-%d: module can't be gotten \n", + (int)(desc - gpio_desc)); } } @@ -177,6 +180,9 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const ch if (desc->chip == NULL) goto done; + if (!try_module_get(desc->chip->owner)) + goto done; + /* NOTE: gpio_request() can be called in early boot, * before IRQs are enabled. */ @@ -184,8 +190,10 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const ch if (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) == 0) { desc_set_label(desc, label ? : "?"); status = 0; - } else + } else { status = -EBUSY; + module_put(desc->chip->owner); + } done: if (status) @@ -209,9 +217,10 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio) spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); desc = &gpio_desc[gpio]; - if (desc->chip && test_and_clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)) + if (desc->chip && test_and_clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)) { desc_set_label(desc, NULL); - else + module_put(desc->chip->owner); + } else WARN_ON(extra_checks); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); diff -puN include/asm-generic/gpio.h~gpiolib-better-rmmod-infrastructure include/asm-generic/gpio.h --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h~gpiolib-better-rmmod-infrastructure +++ a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #endif struct seq_file; +struct module; /** * struct gpio_chip - abstract a GPIO controller @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ struct seq_file; */ struct gpio_chip { char *label; + struct module *owner; int (*direction_input)(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from g.liakhovetski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html