The patch titled
mempolicy: rename mpol_copy to mpol_dup
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: mempolicy: rename mpol_copy to mpol_dup
From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@xxxxxx>
This patch renames mpol_copy() to mpol_dup() because, well, that's what it
does. Like, e.g., strdup() for strings, mpol_dup() takes a pointer to an
existing mempolicy, allocates a new one and copies the contents.
In a later patch, I want to use the name mpol_copy() to copy the contents from
one mempolicy to another like, e.g., strcpy() does for strings.
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@xxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 14 +++++++-------
kernel/cpuset.c | 4 ++--
kernel/fork.c | 4 ++--
mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++---
mm/mmap.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/mempolicy.h~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup include/linux/mempolicy.h
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup
+++ a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -73,10 +73,10 @@ struct mm_struct;
* Mempolicy objects are reference counted. A mempolicy will be freed when
* mpol_put() decrements the reference count to zero.
*
- * Copying policy objects:
- * mpol_copy() allocates a new mempolicy and copies the specified mempolicy
+ * Duplicating policy objects:
+ * mpol_dup() allocates a new mempolicy and copies the specified mempolicy
* to the new storage. The reference count of the new object is initialized
- * to 1, representing the caller of mpol_copy().
+ * to 1, representing the caller of mpol_dup().
*/
struct mempolicy {
atomic_t refcnt;
@@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ static inline void mpol_put(struct mempo
__mpol_put(pol);
}
-extern struct mempolicy *__mpol_copy(struct mempolicy *pol);
-static inline struct mempolicy *mpol_copy(struct mempolicy *pol)
+extern struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *pol);
+static inline struct mempolicy *mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *pol)
{
if (pol)
- pol = __mpol_copy(pol);
+ pol = __mpol_dup(pol);
return pol;
}
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline void mpol_get(struct mempo
{
}
-static inline struct mempolicy *mpol_copy(struct mempolicy *old)
+static inline struct mempolicy *mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old)
{
return NULL;
}
diff -puN kernel/cpuset.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup kernel/cpuset.c
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup
+++ a/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset
cs->mems_generation = cpuset_mems_generation++;
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
- cpuset_being_rebound = cs; /* causes mpol_copy() rebind */
+ cpuset_being_rebound = cs; /* causes mpol_dup() rebind */
fudge = 10; /* spare mmarray[] slots */
fudge += cpus_weight(cs->cpus_allowed); /* imagine one fork-bomb/cpu */
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset
* rebind the vma mempolicies of each mm in mmarray[] to their
* new cpuset, and release that mm. The mpol_rebind_mm()
* call takes mmap_sem, which we couldn't take while holding
- * tasklist_lock. Forks can happen again now - the mpol_copy()
+ * tasklist_lock. Forks can happen again now - the mpol_dup()
* cpuset_being_rebound check will catch such forks, and rebind
* their vma mempolicies too. Because we still hold the global
* cgroup_mutex, we know that no other rebind effort will
diff -puN kernel/fork.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup
+++ a/kernel/fork.c
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm
if (!tmp)
goto fail_nomem;
*tmp = *mpnt;
- pol = mpol_copy(vma_policy(mpnt));
+ pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(mpnt));
retval = PTR_ERR(pol);
if (IS_ERR(pol))
goto fail_nomem_policy;
@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
p->audit_context = NULL;
cgroup_fork(p);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- p->mempolicy = mpol_copy(p->mempolicy);
+ p->mempolicy = mpol_dup(p->mempolicy);
if (IS_ERR(p->mempolicy)) {
retval = PTR_ERR(p->mempolicy);
p->mempolicy = NULL;
diff -puN mm/mempolicy.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup mm/mempolicy.c
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1566,15 +1566,15 @@ struct page *alloc_pages_current(gfp_t g
EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_current);
/*
- * If mpol_copy() sees current->cpuset == cpuset_being_rebound, then it
+ * If mpol_dup() sees current->cpuset == cpuset_being_rebound, then it
* rebinds the mempolicy its copying by calling mpol_rebind_policy()
* with the mems_allowed returned by cpuset_mems_allowed(). This
* keeps mempolicies cpuset relative after its cpuset moves. See
* further kernel/cpuset.c update_nodemask().
*/
-/* Slow path of a mempolicy copy */
-struct mempolicy *__mpol_copy(struct mempolicy *old)
+/* Slow path of a mempolicy duplicate */
+struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old)
{
struct mempolicy *new = kmem_cache_alloc(policy_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
diff -puN mm/mmap.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup mm/mmap.c
--- a/mm/mmap.c~mempolicy-rename-mpol_copy-to-mpol_dup
+++ a/mm/mmap.c
@@ -1810,7 +1810,7 @@ int split_vma(struct mm_struct * mm, str
new->vm_pgoff += ((addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
- pol = mpol_copy(vma_policy(vma));
+ pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(vma));
if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, new);
return PTR_ERR(pol);
@@ -2126,7 +2126,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct v
new_vma = kmem_cache_alloc(vm_area_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
if (new_vma) {
*new_vma = *vma;
- pol = mpol_copy(vma_policy(vma));
+ pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(vma));
if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, new_vma);
return NULL;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from lee.schermerhorn@xxxxxx are
origin.patch
mm-add-nr_writeback_temp-counter-fix.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
