- freezer-document-relationship-with-memory-shrinking.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     freezer: document relationship with memory shrinking
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     freezer-document-relationship-with-memory-shrinking.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: freezer: document relationship with memory shrinking
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>

One important reason to freeze tasks, which is that we don't want them to
allocate memory after freeing it for the hibernation image, has not been
documented.  Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt |   13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt~freezer-document-relationship-with-memory-shrinking Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
--- a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt~freezer-document-relationship-with-memory-shrinking
+++ a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
@@ -81,7 +81,16 @@ hibernation image has been created and b
 The majority of these are user space processes, but if any of the kernel threads
 may cause something like this to happen, they have to be freezable.
 
-2. The second reason is to prevent user space processes and some kernel threads
+2. Next, to create the hibernation image we need to free a sufficient amount of
+memory (approximately 50% of available RAM) and we need to do that before
+devices are deactivated, because we generally need them for swapping out.  Then,
+after the memory for the image has been freed, we don't want tasks to allocate
+additional memory and we prevent them from doing that by freezing them earlier.
+[Of course, this also means that device drivers should not allocate substantial
+amounts of memory from their .suspend() callbacks before hibernation, but this
+is e separate issue.]
+
+3. The third reason is to prevent user space processes and some kernel threads
 from interfering with the suspending and resuming of devices.  A user space
 process running on a second CPU while we are suspending devices may, for
 example, be troublesome and without the freezing of tasks we would need some
@@ -111,7 +120,7 @@ frozen before the driver's .suspend() ca
 thawed after the driver's .resume() callback has run, so it won't be accessing
 the device while it's suspended.
 
-3. Another reason for freezing tasks is to prevent user space processes from
+4. Another reason for freezing tasks is to prevent user space processes from
 realizing that hibernation (or suspend) operation takes place.  Ideally, user
 space processes should not notice that such a system-wide operation has occurred
 and should continue running without any problems after the restore (or resume
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from rjw@xxxxxxx are

origin.patch
git-acpi.patch
revert-x86_64-mm-cpa-einval.patch
shrink_slab-handle-bad-shrinkers.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux