The patch titled
Use write_trylock_irqsave in ptrace_attach
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
use-write_trylock_irqsave-in-ptrace_attach.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Use write_trylock_irqsave in ptrace_attach
From: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch makes ptrace_attach use write_trylock_irqsave().
[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: remove unneeded initialisation]
Signed-off-by: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/ptrace.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/ptrace.c~use-write_trylock_irqsave-in-ptrace_attach kernel/ptrace.c
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c~use-write_trylock_irqsave-in-ptrace_attach
+++ a/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ int ptrace_may_attach(struct task_struct
int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task)
{
int retval;
+ unsigned long flags;
audit_ptrace(task);
@@ -181,9 +182,7 @@ repeat:
* cpu's that may have task_lock).
*/
task_lock(task);
- local_irq_disable();
- if (!write_trylock(&tasklist_lock)) {
- local_irq_enable();
+ if (!write_trylock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags)) {
task_unlock(task);
do {
cpu_relax();
@@ -211,7 +210,7 @@ repeat:
force_sig_specific(SIGSTOP, task);
bad:
- write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+ write_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
task_unlock(task);
out:
return retval;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from sripathik@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
