The patch titled
mistaken ext4_inode_bitmap for ext4_block_bitmap
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mistaken-ext4_inode_bitmap-for-ext4_block_bitmap.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: mistaken ext4_inode_bitmap for ext4_block_bitmap
From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In ext4_new_blocks(), one of two ext4_block_bitmap() calls should be
ext4_inode_bitmap() call. It is not harmful in normal processing, but it
should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/balloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/ext4/balloc.c~mistaken-ext4_inode_bitmap-for-ext4_block_bitmap fs/ext4/balloc.c
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c~mistaken-ext4_inode_bitmap-for-ext4_block_bitmap
+++ a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ allocated:
ret_block = grp_alloc_blk + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group_no);
if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
- in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
+ in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
in_range(ret_block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) ||
in_range(ret_block + num - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from toshi.okajima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
