The patch titled
SM501: Fix sm501_init_reg() mask/set order
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
sm501-fix-sm501_init_reg-mask-set-order.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: SM501: Fix sm501_init_reg() mask/set order
From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
The order of the set and mask operation in sm501_init_reg() was setting and
then masking the bits set. Correct the order so that we do not end up with
288MHz SDRAM clocks on certain systems.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mfd/sm501.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/mfd/sm501.c~sm501-fix-sm501_init_reg-mask-set-order drivers/mfd/sm501.c
--- a/drivers/mfd/sm501.c~sm501-fix-sm501_init_reg-mask-set-order
+++ a/drivers/mfd/sm501.c
@@ -813,6 +813,9 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(dbg_regs, 0666, sm501
/* sm501_init_reg
*
* Helper function for the init code to setup a register
+ *
+ * clear the bits which are set in r->mask, and then set
+ * the bits set in r->set.
*/
static inline void sm501_init_reg(struct sm501_devdata *sm,
@@ -822,8 +825,8 @@ static inline void sm501_init_reg(struct
unsigned long tmp;
tmp = readl(sm->regs + reg);
- tmp |= r->set;
tmp &= ~r->mask;
+ tmp |= r->set;
writel(tmp, sm->regs + reg);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx are
git-watchdog.patch
spi-tle620x-power-switch-driver.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
