The patch titled
SLUB: move resiliency check into SYSFS section
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
slub-move-resiliency-check-into-sysfs-section.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: SLUB: move resiliency check into SYSFS section
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Move the resiliency check into the SYSFS section after validate_slab that is
used by the resiliency check. This will avoid a forward declaration.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/slub.c~slub-move-resiliency-check-into-sysfs-section mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c~slub-move-resiliency-check-into-sysfs-section
+++ a/mm/slub.c
@@ -2512,63 +2512,6 @@ static int __init cpucache_init(void)
__initcall(cpucache_init);
#endif
-#ifdef SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST
-static unsigned long validate_slab_cache(struct kmem_cache *s);
-
-static void resiliency_test(void)
-{
- u8 *p;
-
- printk(KERN_ERR "SLUB resiliency testing\n");
- printk(KERN_ERR "-----------------------\n");
- printk(KERN_ERR "A. Corruption after allocation\n");
-
- p = kzalloc(16, GFP_KERNEL);
- p[16] = 0x12;
- printk(KERN_ERR "\n1. kmalloc-16: Clobber Redzone/next pointer"
- " 0x12->0x%p\n\n", p + 16);
-
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 4);
-
- /* Hmmm... The next two are dangerous */
- p = kzalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
- p[32 + sizeof(void *)] = 0x34;
- printk(KERN_ERR "\n2. kmalloc-32: Clobber next pointer/next slab"
- " 0x34 -> -0x%p\n", p);
- printk(KERN_ERR "If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");
-
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 5);
- p = kzalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL);
- p += 64 + (get_cycles() & 0xff) * sizeof(void *);
- *p = 0x56;
- printk(KERN_ERR "\n3. kmalloc-64: corrupting random byte 0x56->0x%p\n",
- p);
- printk(KERN_ERR "If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 6);
-
- printk(KERN_ERR "\nB. Corruption after free\n");
- p = kzalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL);
- kfree(p);
- *p = 0x78;
- printk(KERN_ERR "1. kmalloc-128: Clobber first word 0x78->0x%p\n\n", p);
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 7);
-
- p = kzalloc(256, GFP_KERNEL);
- kfree(p);
- p[50] = 0x9a;
- printk(KERN_ERR "\n2. kmalloc-256: Clobber 50th byte 0x9a->0x%p\n\n", p);
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 8);
-
- p = kzalloc(512, GFP_KERNEL);
- kfree(p);
- p[512] = 0xab;
- printk(KERN_ERR "\n3. kmalloc-512: Clobber redzone 0xab->0x%p\n\n", p);
- validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 9);
-}
-#else
-static void resiliency_test(void) {};
-#endif
-
void *__kmalloc_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags, void *caller)
{
struct kmem_cache *s = get_slab(size, gfpflags);
@@ -2685,6 +2628,61 @@ static unsigned long validate_slab_cache
return count;
}
+#ifdef SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST
+static void resiliency_test(void)
+{
+ u8 *p;
+
+ printk(KERN_ERR "SLUB resiliency testing\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "-----------------------\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "A. Corruption after allocation\n");
+
+ p = kzalloc(16, GFP_KERNEL);
+ p[16] = 0x12;
+ printk(KERN_ERR "\n1. kmalloc-16: Clobber Redzone/next pointer"
+ " 0x12->0x%p\n\n", p + 16);
+
+ validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 4);
+
+ /* Hmmm... The next two are dangerous */
+ p = kzalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
+ p[32 + sizeof(void *)] = 0x34;
+ printk(KERN_ERR "\n2. kmalloc-32: Clobber next pointer/next slab"
+ " 0x34 -> -0x%p\n", p);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");
+
+ validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 5);
+ p = kzalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL);
+ p += 64 + (get_cycles() & 0xff) * sizeof(void *);
+ *p = 0x56;
+ printk(KERN_ERR "\n3. kmalloc-64: corrupting random byte 0x56->0x%p\n",
+ p);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");
+ validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 6);
+
+ printk(KERN_ERR "\nB. Corruption after free\n");
+ p = kzalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL);
+ kfree(p);
+ *p = 0x78;
+ printk(KERN_ERR "1. kmalloc-128: Clobber first word 0x78->0x%p\n\n", p);
+ validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 7);
+
+ p = kzalloc(256, GFP_KERNEL);
+ kfree(p);
+ p[50] = 0x9a;
+ printk(KERN_ERR "\n2. kmalloc-256: Clobber 50th byte 0x9a->0x%p\n\n", p);
+ validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 8);
+
+ p = kzalloc(512, GFP_KERNEL);
+ kfree(p);
+ p[512] = 0xab;
+ printk(KERN_ERR "\n3. kmalloc-512: Clobber redzone 0xab->0x%p\n\n", p);
+ validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 9);
+}
+#else
+static void resiliency_test(void) {};
+#endif
+
/*
* Generate lists of code addresses where slabcache objects are allocated
* and freed.
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from clameter@xxxxxxx are
origin.patch
slub-support-concurrent-local-and-remote-frees-and-allocs-on-a-slab.patch
quicklist-support-for-ia64.patch
quicklist-support-for-x86_64.patch
slub-exploit-page-mobility-to-increase-allocation-order.patch
slub-mm-only-make-slub-the-default-slab-allocator.patch
slub-reduce-antifrag-max-order.patch
slub-i386-support.patch
define-percpu-smp-cacheline-align-interface.patch
call-percpu-smp-cacheline-algin-interface.patch
remove-constructor-from-buffer_head.patch
mm-implement-swap-prefetching.patch
revoke-core-code.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
