The patch titled
atyfb: increase SPLL delay
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
atyfb-increase-spll-delay.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: atyfb: increase SPLL delay
From: Ville Syrjala <syrjala@xxxxxx>
Wait 5 ms instead of 500 us for the SPLL to lock. This matches the
recommendation in mach64 programmer's guide.
Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c~atyfb-increase-spll-delay drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c
--- a/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c~atyfb-increase-spll-delay
+++ a/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c
@@ -608,12 +608,10 @@ static void aty_resume_pll_ct(const stru
aty_st_pll_ct(SCLK_FB_DIV, pll->ct.sclk_fb_div, par);
aty_st_pll_ct(SPLL_CNTL2, pll->ct.spll_cntl2, par);
/*
- * The sclk has been started. However, I believe the first clock
- * ticks it generates are not very stable. Hope this primitive loop
- * helps for Rage Mobilities that sometimes crash when
- * we switch to sclk. (Daniel Mantione, 13-05-2003)
+ * SCLK has been started. Wait for the PLL to lock. 5 ms
+ * should be enough according to mach64 programmer's guide.
*/
- udelay(500);
+ mdelay(5);
}
aty_st_pll_ct(PLL_REF_DIV, pll->ct.pll_ref_div, par);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from syrjala@xxxxxx are
origin.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
