+ uml-send-pointers-instead-of-structures-to-i-o-thread.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     uml: send pointers instead of structures to I/O thread
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     uml-send-pointers-instead-of-structures-to-i-o-thread.patch

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: uml: send pointers instead of structures to I/O thread
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Instead of writing entire structures between UML and the I/O thread, we send
pointers.  This cuts down on the amount of data being copied and possibly
allows more requests to be pending between the two.

This requires that the requests be kmalloced and freed instead of living on
the stack.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c~uml-send-pointers-instead-of-structures-to-i-o-thread arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
--- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c~uml-send-pointers-instead-of-structures-to-i-o-thread
+++ a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(restart);
 /* Called without dev->lock held, and only in interrupt context. */
 static void ubd_handler(void)
 {
-	struct io_thread_req req;
+	struct io_thread_req *req;
 	struct request *rq;
 	struct ubd *ubd;
 	struct list_head *list, *next_ele;
@@ -511,7 +511,8 @@ static void ubd_handler(void)
 	int n;
 
 	while(1){
-		n = os_read_file_k(thread_fd, &req, sizeof(req));
+		n = os_read_file_k(thread_fd, &req,
+				   sizeof(struct io_thread_req *));
 		if(n != sizeof(req)){
 			if(n == -EAGAIN)
 				break;
@@ -520,10 +521,11 @@ static void ubd_handler(void)
 			return;
 		}
 
-		rq = req.req;
-		rq->nr_sectors -= req.length >> 9;
+		rq = req->req;
+		rq->nr_sectors -= req->length >> 9;
 		if(rq->nr_sectors == 0)
 			ubd_finish(rq, rq->hard_nr_sectors << 9);
+		kfree(req);
 	}
 	reactivate_fd(thread_fd, UBD_IRQ);
 
@@ -1078,7 +1080,7 @@ static void prepare_request(struct reque
 /* Called with dev->lock held */
 static void do_ubd_request(request_queue_t *q)
 {
-	struct io_thread_req io_req;
+	struct io_thread_req *io_req;
 	struct request *req;
 	int n;
 
@@ -1099,13 +1101,20 @@ static void do_ubd_request(request_queue
 		while(dev->start_sg < dev->end_sg){
 			struct scatterlist *sg = &dev->sg[dev->start_sg];
 
-			prepare_request(req, &io_req,
+			io_req = kmalloc(sizeof(struct io_thread_req),
+					 GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC);
+			if(io_req == NULL){
+				if(list_empty(&dev->restart))
+					list_add(&dev->restart, &restart);
+				return;
+			}
+			prepare_request(req, io_req,
 					(unsigned long long) req->sector << 9,
 					sg->offset, sg->length, sg->page);
 
-			n = os_write_file_k(thread_fd, (char *) &io_req,
-					    sizeof(io_req));
-			if(n != sizeof(io_req)){
+			n = os_write_file_k(thread_fd, &io_req,
+					    sizeof(struct io_thread_req *));
+			if(n != sizeof(struct io_thread_req *)){
 				if(n != -EAGAIN)
 					printk("write to io thread failed, "
 					       "errno = %d\n", -n);
@@ -1437,13 +1446,14 @@ static int io_count = 0;
 
 int io_thread(void *arg)
 {
-	struct io_thread_req req;
+	struct io_thread_req *req;
 	int n;
 
 	ignore_sigwinch_sig();
 	while(1){
-		n = os_read_file_k(kernel_fd, &req, sizeof(req));
-		if(n != sizeof(req)){
+		n = os_read_file_k(kernel_fd, &req,
+				 sizeof(struct io_thread_req *));
+		if(n != sizeof(struct io_thread_req *)){
 			if(n < 0)
 				printk("io_thread - read failed, fd = %d, "
 				       "err = %d\n", kernel_fd, -n);
@@ -1454,9 +1464,10 @@ int io_thread(void *arg)
 			continue;
 		}
 		io_count++;
-		do_io(&req);
-		n = os_write_file_k(kernel_fd, &req, sizeof(req));
-		if(n != sizeof(req))
+		do_io(req);
+		n = os_write_file_k(kernel_fd, &req,
+				  sizeof(struct io_thread_req *));
+		if(n != sizeof(struct io_thread_req *))
 			printk("io_thread - write failed, fd = %d, err = %d\n",
 			       kernel_fd, -n);
 	}
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx are

uml-delete-unused-code.patch
uml-formatting-fixes.patch
uml-host_info-tidying.patch
uml-mark-tt-mode-code-for-future-removal.patch
uml-print-coredump-limits.patch
uml-handle-block-device-hotplug-errors.patch
uml-driver-formatting-fixes.patch
uml-driver-formatting-fixes-fix.patch
uml-network-interface-hotplug-error-handling.patch
array_size-check-for-type-uml-fix.patch
uml-fix-prototypes.patch
uml-move-sigio-testing-to-sigioc.patch
uml-create-archh.patch
uml-create-as-layouth.patch
uml-move-remaining-useful-contents-of-user_utilh.patch
uml-remove-user_utilh.patch
uml-add-missing-__init-declarations.patch
remove-unused-header-file-arch-um-kernel-tt-include-mode_kern-tth.patch
uml-speed-up-exec.patch
uml-no-locking-needed-in-tlsc.patch
uml-tidy-processc.patch
uml-tidy-processc-fix.patch
uml-remove-page_size.patch
uml-kernel_thread-shouldnt-panic.patch
uml-tidy-fault-code.patch
uml-kernel-segfaults-should-dump-proper-registers.patch
uml-comment-early-boot-locking.patch
uml-irq-locking-commentary.patch
uml-delete-host_frame_size.patch
uml-drivers-get-release-methods.patch
uml-dump-registers-on-ptrace-or-wait-failure.patch
uml-speed-up-page-table-walking.patch
uml-remove-unused-x86_64-code.patch
uml-start-fixing-os_read_file-and-os_write_file.patch
uml-tidy-libc-code.patch
uml-convert-libc-layer-to-call-read-and-write.patch
uml-batch-i-o-requests.patch
uml-send-pointers-instead-of-structures-to-i-o-thread.patch
uml-dump-core-on-panic.patch
uml-dont-try-to-handle-signals-on-initial-process-stack.patch
sys_futex64-allows-64bit-futexes-workaround-for-uml.patch
utrace-uml-make-uml-compile-with-utrace-enabled.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux