The patch titled
knfsd: nfsd4: acls: avoid unnecessary denies
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
knfsd-nfsd4-acls-avoid-unnecessary-denies.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: knfsd: nfsd4: acls: avoid unnecessary denies
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
We're inserting deny's between some ACEs in order to enforce posix draft acl
semantics which prevent permissions from accumulating across entries in an
acl.
That's fine, but we're doing that by inserting a deny after *every* allow,
which is overkill. We shouldn't be adding them in places where they actually
make no difference.
Also replaced some helper functions for creating acl entries; I prefer just
assigning directly to the struct fields--it takes a few more lines, but the
field names provide some documentation that I think makes the result easier
understand.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 145 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c~knfsd-nfsd4-acls-avoid-unnecessary-denies fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c~knfsd-nfsd4-acls-avoid-unnecessary-denies
+++ a/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c
@@ -89,12 +89,19 @@ mask_from_posix(unsigned short perm, uns
}
static u32
-deny_mask(u32 allow_mask, unsigned int flags)
+deny_mask_from_posix(unsigned short perm, u32 flags)
{
- u32 ret = ~allow_mask & ~NFS4_MASK_UNSUPP;
- if (!(flags & NFS4_ACL_DIR))
- ret &= ~NFS4_ACE_DELETE_CHILD;
- return ret;
+ u32 mask = 0;
+
+ if (perm & ACL_READ)
+ mask |= NFS4_READ_MODE;
+ if (perm & ACL_WRITE)
+ mask |= NFS4_WRITE_MODE;
+ if ((perm & ACL_WRITE) && (flags & NFS4_ACL_DIR))
+ mask |= NFS4_ACE_DELETE_CHILD;
+ if (perm & ACL_EXECUTE)
+ mask |= NFS4_EXECUTE_MODE;
+ return mask;
}
/* XXX: modify functions to return NFS errors; they're only ever
@@ -164,14 +171,51 @@ nfs4_acl_posix_to_nfsv4(struct posix_acl
return acl;
}
+struct posix_acl_summary {
+ unsigned short owner;
+ unsigned short users;
+ unsigned short group;
+ unsigned short groups;
+ unsigned short other;
+ unsigned short mask;
+};
+
static void
-nfs4_acl_add_pair(struct nfs4_acl *acl, int eflag, u32 mask, int whotype,
- uid_t owner, unsigned int flags)
+summarize_posix_acl(struct posix_acl *acl, struct posix_acl_summary *pas)
{
- nfs4_acl_add_ace(acl, NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE,
- eflag, mask, whotype, owner);
- nfs4_acl_add_ace(acl, NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE,
- eflag, deny_mask(mask, flags), whotype, owner);
+ struct posix_acl_entry *pa, *pe;
+ pas->users = 0;
+ pas->groups = 0;
+ pas->mask = 07;
+
+ pe = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count;
+
+ FOREACH_ACL_ENTRY(pa, acl, pe) {
+ switch (pa->e_tag) {
+ case ACL_USER_OBJ:
+ pas->owner = pa->e_perm;
+ break;
+ case ACL_GROUP_OBJ:
+ pas->group = pa->e_perm;
+ break;
+ case ACL_USER:
+ pas->users |= pa->e_perm;
+ break;
+ case ACL_GROUP:
+ pas->groups |= pa->e_perm;
+ break;
+ case ACL_OTHER:
+ pas->other = pa->e_perm;
+ break;
+ case ACL_MASK:
+ pas->mask = pa->e_perm;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ /* We'll only care about effective permissions: */
+ pas->users &= pas->mask;
+ pas->group &= pas->mask;
+ pas->groups &= pas->mask;
}
/* We assume the acl has been verified with posix_acl_valid. */
@@ -179,30 +223,63 @@ static void
_posix_to_nfsv4_one(struct posix_acl *pacl, struct nfs4_acl *acl,
unsigned int flags)
{
- struct posix_acl_entry *pa, *pe, *group_owner_entry;
- u32 mask;
- unsigned short mask_mask;
+ struct posix_acl_entry *pa, *group_owner_entry;
+ struct nfs4_ace *ace;
+ struct posix_acl_summary pas;
+ unsigned short deny;
int eflag = ((flags & NFS4_ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT) ?
NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS : 0);
BUG_ON(pacl->a_count < 3);
- pe = pacl->a_entries + pacl->a_count;
- pa = pe - 2; /* if mask entry exists, it's second from the last. */
- if (pa->e_tag == ACL_MASK)
- mask_mask = pa->e_perm;
- else
- mask_mask = S_IRWXO;
+ summarize_posix_acl(pacl, &pas);
pa = pacl->a_entries;
- BUG_ON(pa->e_tag != ACL_USER_OBJ);
- mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm, flags | NFS4_ACL_OWNER);
- nfs4_acl_add_pair(acl, eflag, mask, NFS4_ACL_WHO_OWNER, 0, flags);
+ ace = acl->aces + acl->naces;
+
+ /* We could deny everything not granted by the owner: */
+ deny = ~pas.owner;
+ /*
+ * but it is equivalent (and simpler) to deny only what is not
+ * granted by later entries:
+ */
+ deny &= pas.users | pas.group | pas.groups | pas.other;
+ if (deny) {
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag;
+ ace->access_mask = deny_mask_from_posix(deny, flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_OWNER;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
+ }
+
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag;
+ ace->access_mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm, flags | NFS4_ACL_OWNER);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_OWNER;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
pa++;
while (pa->e_tag == ACL_USER) {
- mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm & mask_mask, flags);
- nfs4_acl_add_pair(acl, eflag, mask,
- NFS4_ACL_WHO_NAMED, pa->e_id, flags);
+ deny = ~(pa->e_perm & pas.mask);
+ deny &= pas.groups | pas.group | pas.other;
+ if (deny) {
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag;
+ ace->access_mask = deny_mask_from_posix(deny, flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_NAMED;
+ ace->who = pa->e_id;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
+ }
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag;
+ ace->access_mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm & pas.mask,
+ flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_NAMED;
+ ace->who = pa->e_id;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
pa++;
}
@@ -212,41 +289,64 @@ _posix_to_nfsv4_one(struct posix_acl *pa
/* allow ACEs */
group_owner_entry = pa;
- mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm & mask_mask, flags);
- nfs4_acl_add_ace(acl, NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE,
- NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP | eflag, mask,
- NFS4_ACL_WHO_GROUP, 0);
+
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag;
+ ace->access_mask = mask_from_posix(pas.group, flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_GROUP;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
pa++;
while (pa->e_tag == ACL_GROUP) {
- mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm & mask_mask, flags);
- nfs4_acl_add_ace(acl, NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE,
- NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP | eflag, mask,
- NFS4_ACL_WHO_NAMED, pa->e_id);
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag | NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP;
+ ace->access_mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm & pas.mask,
+ flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_NAMED;
+ ace->who = pa->e_id;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
pa++;
}
/* deny ACEs */
pa = group_owner_entry;
- mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm, flags);
- nfs4_acl_add_ace(acl, NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE,
- NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP | eflag,
- deny_mask(mask, flags), NFS4_ACL_WHO_GROUP, 0);
+
+ deny = ~pas.group & pas.other;
+ if (deny) {
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag | NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP;
+ ace->access_mask = deny_mask_from_posix(deny, flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_GROUP;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
+ }
pa++;
+
while (pa->e_tag == ACL_GROUP) {
- mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm, flags);
- nfs4_acl_add_ace(acl, NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE,
- NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP | eflag,
- deny_mask(mask, flags), NFS4_ACL_WHO_NAMED, pa->e_id);
+ deny = ~(pa->e_perm & pas.mask);
+ deny &= pas.other;
+ if (deny) {
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag | NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP;
+ ace->access_mask = mask_from_posix(deny, flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_NAMED;
+ ace->who = pa->e_id;
+ ace++;
+ acl->naces++;
+ }
pa++;
}
if (pa->e_tag == ACL_MASK)
pa++;
- BUG_ON(pa->e_tag != ACL_OTHER);
- mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm, flags);
- nfs4_acl_add_pair(acl, eflag, mask, NFS4_ACL_WHO_EVERYONE, 0, flags);
+ ace->type = NFS4_ACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
+ ace->flag = eflag;
+ ace->access_mask = mask_from_posix(pa->e_perm, flags);
+ ace->whotype = NFS4_ACL_WHO_EVERYONE;
+ acl->naces++;
}
static void
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
