On Sun, 2025-03-16 at 23:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:51:53 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > One false warning that will be generated due to this change is in case we > > > have a patch that modifies a `pr_* call without a newline` which has a > > > pr_cont with a newline following it. In this case there will be a warning > > > but because the patch does not include the following pr_cont it will warn > > > there is nothing creating a newline. I have modified the warning to be > > > softer due to this known problem. > > > > I think this patch is a merely a conversion of one defect for another > > and it's quite compilcated code too. > > Well darn, it would have been nice to receive this review during the > review! > > Should I drop the patch? I don't think it's particularly valuable or useful.
