The quilt patch titled Subject: test_xarray: fix failure in check_pause when CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI is not defined has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was test_xarray-fix-failure-in-check_pause-when-config_xarray_multi-is-not-defined.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm ------------------------------------------------------ From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: test_xarray: fix failure in check_pause when CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI is not defined Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:36:59 +0800 In case CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI is not defined, xa_store_order can store a multi-index entry but xas_for_each can't tell sbiling entry from valid entry. So the check_pause failed when we store a multi-index entry and wish xas_for_each can handle it normally. Avoid to store multi-index entry when CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI is disabled to fix the failure. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250213163659.414309-1-shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: c9ba5249ef8b ("Xarray: move forward index correctly in xas_pause()") Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAMuHMdU_bfadUO=0OZ=AoQ9EAmQPA4wsLCBqohXR+QCeCKRn4A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- lib/test_xarray.c | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/lib/test_xarray.c~test_xarray-fix-failure-in-check_pause-when-config_xarray_multi-is-not-defined +++ a/lib/test_xarray.c @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ static noinline void check_pause(struct { XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0); void *entry; - unsigned int order; + int order; unsigned long index = 1; unsigned int count = 0; @@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ static noinline void check_pause(struct xa_destroy(xa); index = 0; - for (order = XA_CHUNK_SHIFT; order > 0; order--) { + for (order = order_limit - 1; order >= 0; order--) { XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, index, order, xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL)); index += 1UL << order; @@ -1462,24 +1462,25 @@ static noinline void check_pause(struct rcu_read_lock(); xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) { XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index)); - index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count); + index += 1UL << (order_limit - count - 1); count++; } rcu_read_unlock(); - XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT); + XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != order_limit); index = 0; count = 0; - xas_set(&xas, XA_CHUNK_SIZE / 2 + 1); + /* test unaligned index */ + xas_set(&xas, 1 % (1UL << (order_limit - 1))); rcu_read_lock(); xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) { XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index)); - index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count); + index += 1UL << (order_limit - count - 1); count++; xas_pause(&xas); } rcu_read_unlock(); - XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT); + XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != order_limit); xa_destroy(xa); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are