> I see that somebody posted something similar on the bugzilla [1]. Is > that person you, by any chance? If so, can you please post your > findings to linux kernel mailing list? E.g. linux-ext4@, Cc-ing > linux-fsdevevl@ and linux-mm@ would be a good start. Bugzilla is > not used. > > If this problem is in ext4 then I'd really prefer to address it there and > drop this patch from zram, simply because it covers an issue in the upper > layer. And it's better to fix issues that to cover them. > > [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219548 He is my colleague, he reported a bug, but no solution has been found yet. In any case, zram should ensure that its data is not damaged, and not rechecking the length after recompression will cause more serious consequences.
