The patch titled
Subject: selftests: mm: fix conversion specifiers in transact_test()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
selftests-mm-fix-conversion-specifiers-in-transact_test.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/selftests-mm-fix-conversion-specifiers-in-transact_test.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: guanjing <guanjing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: selftests: mm: fix conversion specifiers in transact_test()
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:12:31 +0800
Lots of incorrect conversion specifiers. Fix them.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241117071231.177864-1-guanjing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 46fd75d4a3c9 ("selftests: mm: add pagemap ioctl tests")
Signed-off-by: guanjing <guanjing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c~selftests-mm-fix-conversion-specifiers-in-transact_test
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
@@ -1405,9 +1405,9 @@ static void transact_test(int page_size)
memset(mem, 0, 0x1000 * nthreads * pages_per_thread);
count = get_dirty_pages_reset(mem, nthreads * pages_per_thread, 1, page_size);
- ksft_test_result(count > 0, "%s count %d\n", __func__, count);
+ ksft_test_result(count > 0, "%s count %u\n", __func__, count);
count = get_dirty_pages_reset(mem, nthreads * pages_per_thread, 1, page_size);
- ksft_test_result(count == 0, "%s count %d\n", __func__, count);
+ ksft_test_result(count == 0, "%s count %u\n", __func__, count);
finish = 0;
for (i = 0; i < nthreads; ++i)
@@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ static void transact_test(int page_size)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("pthread_barrier_wait\n");
if (count > nthreads * access_per_thread)
- ksft_exit_fail_msg("Too big count %d expected %d, iter %d\n",
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Too big count %u expected %u, iter %u\n",
count, nthreads * access_per_thread, i);
c = get_dirty_pages_reset(mem, nthreads * pages_per_thread, 1, page_size);
@@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ static void transact_test(int page_size)
* access and application gets page fault again for the same write.
*/
if (count < nthreads * access_per_thread) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Lost update, iter %d, %d vs %d.\n", i, count,
+ ksft_test_result_fail("Lost update, iter %u, %u vs %u.\n", i, count,
nthreads * access_per_thread);
return;
}
@@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@ static void transact_test(int page_size)
finish = 1;
pthread_barrier_wait(&end_barrier);
- ksft_test_result_pass("%s Extra pages %u (%.1lf%%), extra thread faults %d.\n", __func__,
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s Extra pages %u (%.1lf%%), extra thread faults %u.\n", __func__,
extra_pages,
100.0 * extra_pages / (iter_count * nthreads * access_per_thread),
extra_thread_faults);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from guanjing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
selftests-mm-fix-conversion-specifiers-in-transact_test.patch
