+ mm-page_vma_mapped_walk-map_pte-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch added to mm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm: page_vma_mapped_walk: map_pte() use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-page_vma_mapped_walk-map_pte-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-page_vma_mapped_walk-map_pte-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: page_vma_mapped_walk: map_pte() use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock()
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:46:23 +0800

In the caller of map_pte(), we may modify the pvmw->pte after acquiring
the pvmw->ptl, so convert it to using pte_offset_map_rw_nolock().  At this
time, the pte_same() check is not performed after the pvmw->ptl held, so
we should get pmdval and do pmd_same() check to ensure the stability of
pvmw->pmd.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2620a48f34c9f19864ab0169cdbf253d31a8fcaa.1727332572.git.zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/page_vma_mapped.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c~mm-page_vma_mapped_walk-map_pte-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock
+++ a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ static inline bool not_found(struct page
 	return false;
 }
 
-static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, spinlock_t **ptlp)
+static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, pmd_t *pmdvalp,
+		    spinlock_t **ptlp)
 {
 	pte_t ptent;
 
@@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapp
 		return !!pvmw->pte;
 	}
 
+again:
 	/*
 	 * It is important to return the ptl corresponding to pte,
 	 * in case *pvmw->pmd changes underneath us; so we need to
@@ -32,8 +34,8 @@ static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapp
 	 * proceeds to loop over next ptes, and finds a match later.
 	 * Though, in most cases, page lock already protects this.
 	 */
-	pvmw->pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->pmd,
-					  pvmw->address, ptlp);
+	pvmw->pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->pmd,
+					     pvmw->address, pmdvalp, ptlp);
 	if (!pvmw->pte)
 		return false;
 
@@ -67,8 +69,13 @@ static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapp
 	} else if (!pte_present(ptent)) {
 		return false;
 	}
+	spin_lock(*ptlp);
+	if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*pmdvalp, pmdp_get_lockless(pvmw->pmd)))) {
+		pte_unmap_unlock(pvmw->pte, *ptlp);
+		goto again;
+	}
 	pvmw->ptl = *ptlp;
-	spin_lock(pvmw->ptl);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -278,7 +285,7 @@ restart:
 			step_forward(pvmw, PMD_SIZE);
 			continue;
 		}
-		if (!map_pte(pvmw, &ptl)) {
+		if (!map_pte(pvmw, &pmde, &ptl)) {
 			if (!pvmw->pte)
 				goto restart;
 			goto next_pte;
@@ -305,8 +312,13 @@ next_pte:
 		} while (pte_none(ptep_get(pvmw->pte)));
 
 		if (!pvmw->ptl) {
+			spin_lock(ptl);
+			if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmde, pmdp_get_lockless(pvmw->pmd)))) {
+				pte_unmap_unlock(pvmw->pte, ptl);
+				pvmw->pte = NULL;
+				goto restart;
+			}
 			pvmw->ptl = ptl;
-			spin_lock(pvmw->ptl);
 		}
 		goto this_pte;
 	} while (pvmw->address < end);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are

mm-pgtable-introduce-pte_offset_map_rorw_nolock.patch
powerpc-assert_pte_locked-use-pte_offset_map_ro_nolock.patch
mm-filemap-filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none-use-pte_offset_map_ro_nolock.patch
mm-khugepaged-__collapse_huge_page_swapin-use-pte_offset_map_ro_nolock.patch
arm-adjust_pte-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-handle_pte_fault-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-khugepaged-collapse_pte_mapped_thp-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-copy_pte_range-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-mremap-move_ptes-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-page_vma_mapped_walk-map_pte-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-userfaultfd-move_pages_pte-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-walk_pte_range-use-pte_offset_map_rw_nolock.patch
mm-pgtable-remove-pte_offset_map_nolock.patch





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux