+ mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly.patch added to mm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm: memcg: don't call propagate_protected_usage() needlessly
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: memcg: don't call propagate_protected_usage() needlessly
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:31:08 +0000

Patch series "mm: memcg: page counters optimizations", v3.

This patchset contains 3 independent small optimizations of page counters.


This patch (of 3):

Memory protection (min/low) requires a constant tracking of protected
memory usage.  propagate_protected_usage() is called on each page counters
update and does a number of operations even in cases when the actual
memory protection functionality is not supported (e.g.  hugetlb cgroups or
memcg swap counters).

It's obviously inefficient and leads to a waste of CPU cycles.  It can be
addressed by calling propagate_protected_usage() only for the counters
which do support memory guarantees.  As of now it's only memcg->memory -
the unified memory memcg counter.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240726203110.1577216-2-roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/page_counter.h |    8 +++++++-
 mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c          |    4 ++--
 mm/memcontrol.c              |   16 ++++++++--------
 mm/page_counter.c            |   16 +++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/page_counter.h~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/include/linux/page_counter.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct page_counter {
 	/* Keep all the read most fields in a separete cacheline. */
 	CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad2_);
 
+	bool protection_support;
 	unsigned long min;
 	unsigned long low;
 	unsigned long high;
@@ -45,12 +46,17 @@ struct page_counter {
 #define PAGE_COUNTER_MAX (LONG_MAX / PAGE_SIZE)
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Protection is supported only for the first counter (with id 0).
+ */
 static inline void page_counter_init(struct page_counter *counter,
-				     struct page_counter *parent)
+				     struct page_counter *parent,
+				     bool protection_support)
 {
 	atomic_long_set(&counter->usage, 0);
 	counter->max = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX;
 	counter->parent = parent;
+	counter->protection_support = protection_support;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long page_counter_read(struct page_counter *counter)
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
@@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ static void hugetlb_cgroup_init(struct h
 		}
 		page_counter_init(hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cgroup,
 								     idx),
-				  fault_parent);
+				  fault_parent, false);
 		page_counter_init(
 			hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(h_cgroup, idx),
-			rsvd_parent);
+			rsvd_parent, false);
 
 		limit = round_down(PAGE_COUNTER_MAX,
 				   pages_per_huge_page(&hstates[idx]));
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3585,21 +3585,21 @@ mem_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup_subsy
 	if (parent) {
 		WRITE_ONCE(memcg->swappiness, mem_cgroup_swappiness(parent));
 
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory, true);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap, false);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
 		WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable, READ_ONCE(parent->oom_kill_disable));
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem, false);
 #endif
 	} else {
 		init_memcg_stats();
 		init_memcg_events();
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL, true);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL, false);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL, false);
 #endif
 		root_mem_cgroup = memcg;
 		return &memcg->css;
--- a/mm/page_counter.c~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/mm/page_counter.c
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 
+static bool track_protection(struct page_counter *c)
+{
+	return c->protection_support;
+}
+
 static void propagate_protected_usage(struct page_counter *c,
 				      unsigned long usage)
 {
@@ -57,7 +62,8 @@ void page_counter_cancel(struct page_cou
 		new = 0;
 		atomic_long_set(&counter->usage, new);
 	}
-	propagate_protected_usage(counter, new);
+	if (track_protection(counter))
+		propagate_protected_usage(counter, new);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -70,12 +76,14 @@ void page_counter_cancel(struct page_cou
 void page_counter_charge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages)
 {
 	struct page_counter *c;
+	bool protection = track_protection(counter);
 
 	for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) {
 		long new;
 
 		new = atomic_long_add_return(nr_pages, &c->usage);
-		propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
+		if (protection)
+			propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
 		/*
 		 * This is indeed racy, but we can live with some
 		 * inaccuracy in the watermark.
@@ -112,6 +120,7 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
 			     struct page_counter **fail)
 {
 	struct page_counter *c;
+	bool protection = track_protection(counter);
 
 	for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) {
 		long new;
@@ -141,7 +150,8 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
 			*fail = c;
 			goto failed;
 		}
-		propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
+		if (protection)
+			propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
 
 		/* see comment on page_counter_charge */
 		if (new > READ_ONCE(c->local_watermark)) {
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx are

mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly.patch
mm-page_counters-put-page_counter_calculate_protection-under-config_memcg.patch
mm-page_counters-initialize-usage-using-atomic_long_init-macro.patch





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux