[merged mm-stable] powerpc-e500-dont-pre-check-write-access-on-data-tlb-error.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The quilt patch titled
     Subject: powerpc/e500: don't pre-check write access on data TLB error
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     powerpc-e500-dont-pre-check-write-access-on-data-tlb-error.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: powerpc/e500: don't pre-check write access on data TLB error
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:51:30 +0200

Don't pre-check write access on read-only pages on data TLB error.

Load the TLB anyway and take a DSI exception when it happens.  This avoids
reading SPRN_ESR at every data TLB error exception.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8525518e1657d6032b7e980c1888102828d66950.1719928057.git.christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S |   15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S~powerpc-e500-dont-pre-check-write-access-on-data-tlb-error
+++ a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S
@@ -472,27 +472,12 @@ END_BTB_FLUSH_SECTION
 #endif
 
 4:
-	/* Mask of required permission bits. Note that while we
-	 * do copy ESR:ST to _PAGE_WRITE position as trying to write
-	 * to an RO page is pretty common, we don't do it with
-	 * _PAGE_DIRTY. We could do it, but it's a fairly rare
-	 * event so I'd rather take the overhead when it happens
-	 * rather than adding an instruction here. We should measure
-	 * whether the whole thing is worth it in the first place
-	 * as we could avoid loading SPRN_ESR completely in the first
-	 * place...
-	 *
-	 * TODO: Is it worth doing that mfspr & rlwimi in the first
-	 *       place or can we save a couple of instructions here ?
-	 */
-	mfspr	r12,SPRN_ESR
 #ifdef CONFIG_PTE_64BIT
 	li	r13,_PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_BAP_SR
 	oris	r13,r13,_PAGE_ACCESSED@h
 #else
 	li	r13,_PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_READ|_PAGE_ACCESSED
 #endif
-	rlwimi	r13,r12,11,29,29
 
 	FIND_PTE
 	andc.	r13,r13,r11		/* Check permission */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx are






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux