Re: [nacked] memfd-mfd_noexec_seal-should-not-imply-mfd_allow_sealing.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 20:00:02 +0000 Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 2024. június 14., péntek 20:27 keltezéssel, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> írta:
> 
> > The quilt patch titled
> >      Subject: memfd: `MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL` should not imply `MFD_ALLOW_SEALING`
> > has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
> >      memfd-mfd_noexec_seal-should-not-imply-mfd_allow_sealing.patch
> > 
> > This patch was dropped because it was nacked
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> do I gather it correctly that this is the final decision, and there is not much
> willingness to try to remove this quirk of the `memfd_create()`? As far as I can tell,
> the change was in linux-next for some time, did that uncover any problems? (If so,
> I haven't been notified.)
> 
> Anyways, I believe I have laid out my arguments already, so I won't repeat them here,
> and if this is final, then I will stop wasting everyone's time with further emails. :-)

We do appear to be stuck.

Please feel free to pursue this.  Reissue the patch with an updated
changelog which addresses the various issues which have been raised
thus far and let's reexamine.





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux