The patch titled
Subject: mm/mlock: implement folio_mlock_step() using folio_pte_batch()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-mlock-implement-folio_mlock_step-using-folio_pte_batch.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-mlock-implement-folio_mlock_step-using-folio_pte_batch.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/mlock: implement folio_mlock_step() using folio_pte_batch()
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:04:18 +0800
Let's make folio_mlock_step() simply a wrapper around folio_pte_batch(),
which will greatly reduce the cost of ptep_get() when scanning a range of
contptes.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240611010418.70797-1-ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bang Li <libang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/mlock.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mlock.c~mm-mlock-implement-folio_mlock_step-using-folio_pte_batch
+++ a/mm/mlock.c
@@ -307,26 +307,15 @@ void munlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
static inline unsigned int folio_mlock_step(struct folio *folio,
pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
{
- unsigned int count, i, nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
- unsigned long pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
+ const fpb_t fpb_flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY;
+ unsigned int count = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
pte_t ptent = ptep_get(pte);
if (!folio_test_large(folio))
return 1;
- count = pfn + nr - pte_pfn(ptent);
- count = min_t(unsigned int, count, (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-
- for (i = 0; i < count; i++, pte++) {
- pte_t entry = ptep_get(pte);
-
- if (!pte_present(entry))
- break;
- if (pte_pfn(entry) - pfn >= nr)
- break;
- }
-
- return i;
+ return folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, pte, ptent, count, fpb_flags, NULL,
+ NULL, NULL);
}
static inline bool allow_mlock_munlock(struct folio *folio,
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx are
mm-rmap-remove-duplicated-exit-code-in-pagewalk-loop.patch
mm-rmap-add-helper-to-restart-pgtable-walk-on-changes.patch
mm-rmap-integrate-pmd-mapped-folio-splitting-into-pagewalk-loop.patch
mm-vmscan-avoid-split-lazyfree-thp-during-shrink_folio_list.patch
mm-mlock-implement-folio_mlock_step-using-folio_pte_batch.patch
