+ mm-memory_hotplug-drop-memblock_phys_free-call-in-try_remove_memory.patch added to mm-unstable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/memory_hotplug: drop memblock_phys_free() call in try_remove_memory()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-memory_hotplug-drop-memblock_phys_free-call-in-try_remove_memory.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-memory_hotplug-drop-memblock_phys_free-call-in-try_remove_memory.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/memory_hotplug: drop memblock_phys_free() call in try_remove_memory()
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:20:49 +0300

The call for memblock_phys_free() in try_remove_memory() does not balance
any call to memblock_alloc() (or memblock_reserve() for that matter).

There are no memblock_reserve() calls in mm/memory_hotplug.c, no memblock
allocations possible after mm_core_init(), and even if memblock_add_node()
called from add_memory_resource() would need to allocate memory, that
memory would ba allocated from slab.

The patch f9126ab9241f ("memory-hotplug: fix wrong edge when hot add a new
node") that introduced that call to memblock_free() does not provide
adequate description why that was required and tinkering with memblock in
the context of memory hotplug on x86 seems bogus because x86 never kept
memblock after boot anyway.

Drop memblock_phys_free() call in try_remove_memory().

[rppt@xxxxxxxxxx: rewrite the commit message]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240605082049.973242-1-rppt@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memory_hotplug.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-memory_hotplug-drop-memblock_phys_free-call-in-try_remove_memory
+++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -2282,10 +2282,8 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 s
 		remove_memory_blocks_and_altmaps(start, size);
 	}
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK)) {
-		memblock_phys_free(start, size);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK))
 		memblock_remove(start, size);
-	}
 
 	release_mem_region_adjustable(start, size);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx are

mm-memory_hotplug-drop-memblock_phys_free-call-in-try_remove_memory.patch





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux