The patch titled Subject: selftests/memfd_secret: add vmsplice() test has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is selftests-memfd_secret-add-vmsplice-test.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/selftests-memfd_secret-add-vmsplice-test.patch This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: selftests/memfd_secret: add vmsplice() test Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:41:13 +0100 Let's add a simple reproducer for a scneario where GUP-fast could succeed on secretmem folios, making vmsplice() succeed instead of failing. The reproducer is based on a reproducer [1] by Miklos Szeredi. Perform the ftruncate() only once, and check the return value. For some reason, vmsplice() reliably fails (making the test succeed) when we move the test_vmsplice() call after test_process_vm_read() / test_ptrace(). Properly cleaning up in test_remote_access(), which is not part of this change, won't change that behavior. Therefore, run the vmsplice() test for now first -- something is a bit off once we involve fork(). [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJfpegt3UCsMmxd0taOY11Uaw5U=eS1fE5dn0wZX3HF0oy8-oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240325134114.257544-3-david@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: yue sun <samsun1006219@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c~selftests-memfd_secret-add-vmsplice-test +++ a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <errno.h> #include <stdio.h> +#include <fcntl.h> #include "../kselftest.h" @@ -83,6 +84,43 @@ static void test_mlock_limit(int fd) pass("mlock limit is respected\n"); } +static void test_vmsplice(int fd) +{ + ssize_t transferred; + struct iovec iov; + int pipefd[2]; + char *mem; + + if (pipe(pipefd)) { + fail("pipe failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)); + return; + } + + mem = mmap(NULL, page_size, prot, mode, fd, 0); + if (mem == MAP_FAILED) { + fail("Unable to mmap secret memory\n"); + goto close_pipe; + } + + /* + * vmsplice() may use GUP-fast, which must also fail. Prefault the + * page table, so GUP-fast could find it. + */ + memset(mem, PATTERN, page_size); + + iov.iov_base = mem; + iov.iov_len = page_size; + transferred = vmsplice(pipefd[1], &iov, 1, 0); + + ksft_test_result(transferred < 0 && errno == EFAULT, + "vmsplice is blocked as expected\n"); + + munmap(mem, page_size); +close_pipe: + close(pipefd[0]); + close(pipefd[1]); +} + static void try_process_vm_read(int fd, int pipefd[2]) { struct iovec liov, riov; @@ -187,7 +225,6 @@ static void test_remote_access(int fd, c return; } - ftruncate(fd, page_size); memset(mem, PATTERN, page_size); if (write(pipefd[1], &mem, sizeof(mem)) < 0) { @@ -258,7 +295,7 @@ static void prepare(void) strerror(errno)); } -#define NUM_TESTS 4 +#define NUM_TESTS 5 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { @@ -277,9 +314,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ksft_exit_fail_msg("memfd_secret failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)); } + if (ftruncate(fd, page_size)) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("ftruncate failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)); test_mlock_limit(fd); test_file_apis(fd); + test_vmsplice(fd); test_process_vm_read(fd); test_ptrace(fd); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@xxxxxxxxxx are mm-secretmem-fix-gup-fast-succeeding-on-secretmem-folios.patch mm-madvise-make-madv_populate_readwrite-handle-vm_fault_retry-properly.patch mm-madvise-dont-perform-madvise-vma-walk-for-madv_populate_readwrite.patch mm-userfaultfd-dont-place-zeropages-when-zeropages-are-disallowed.patch s390-mm-re-enable-the-shared-zeropage-for-pv-and-skeys-kvm-guests.patch mm-convert-folio_estimated_sharers-to-folio_likely_mapped_shared.patch selftests-memfd_secret-add-vmsplice-test.patch mm-merge-folio_is_secretmem-into-folio_fast_pin_allowed.patch