The patch titled
Subject: rmap: peplace two calls to compound_order with folio_order
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
rmap-replace-two-calls-to-compound_order-with-folio_order.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/rmap-replace-two-calls-to-compound_order-with-folio_order.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: rmap: peplace two calls to compound_order with folio_order
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:53:05 +0000
Removes two unnecessary conversions from folio to page. Should be no
difference in behaviour.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240215205307.674707-1-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/rmap.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/rmap.c~rmap-replace-two-calls-to-compound_order-with-folio_order
+++ a/mm/rmap.c
@@ -2169,7 +2169,7 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct fo
swp_pte = pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(swp_pte);
set_pte_at(mm, pvmw.address, pvmw.pte, swp_pte);
trace_set_migration_pte(pvmw.address, pte_val(swp_pte),
- compound_order(&folio->page));
+ folio_order(folio));
/*
* No need to invalidate here it will synchronize on
* against the special swap migration pte.
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct fo
else
set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, swp_pte);
trace_set_migration_pte(address, pte_val(swp_pte),
- compound_order(&folio->page));
+ folio_order(folio));
/*
* No need to invalidate here it will synchronize on
* against the special swap migration pte.
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
memcg-convert-mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range-to-use-a-folio.patch
memcg-return-the-folio-in-union-mc_target.patch
memcg-use-a-folio-in-get_mctgt_type.patch
memcg-use-a-folio-in-get_mctgt_type_thp.patch
mm-add-pfn_swap_entry_folio.patch
proc-use-pfn_swap_entry_folio-where-obvious.patch
mprotect-use-pfn_swap_entry_folio.patch
highmem-add-kernel-doc-for-memcpy__folio.patch
rmap-replace-two-calls-to-compound_order-with-folio_order.patch
bounds-support-non-power-of-two-config_nr_cpus.patch
