On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:25:12 +0000 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19/12/2023 10:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>> In any case, this series makes significant changes to the low-level > >>> arm64 mm code and I don't think many of us will be around in the next > >>> couple of weeks to deal with the fallout if it kicks up any issues. > >>> > >>> Andrew -- if Ryan doesn't object, please can you drop this for now? > >> > >> It's always nice to get linux-next soak time; Is there a middle ground where we > >> keep it in mm-unstable for a bit but don't progress it to mm-stable, and if > >> there are any arm64 bug reports we drop it? Or is that too complicated? > > > > If stuff is lurking too long in -next/mm-unstable, it might create conflicts > > with other patch sets that might go upstream / to mm-stable faster. > > Yeah fair enough (can't imagine what you might be thinking of :) ). > > Let's drop it then. Gone, thanks.
