On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 6:35 PM Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: cuibixuan <cuibixuan@xxxxxxxx> > > Add a new event to calculate the shrink_inactive_list()/shrink_active_list() > execution time. > > Example of output: > kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353020: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_start: nid=0 > kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353040: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_end: nid=0 nr_taken=32 nr_active=0 nr_deactivated=32 nr_referenced=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC > kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353040: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start: nid=0 > kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353094: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end: nid=0 nr_scanned=32 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=32 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC > kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353094: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start: nid=0 > kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353162: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end: nid=0 nr_scanned=32 nr_reclaimed=21 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=11 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC > > Signed-off-by: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@xxxxxxxx> NAK. A _start should always be paired with an _end unless there is a good reason not to. mm-commits@ is the wrong mailing list to submit MM patches. Is the build error Andrew pointed out earlier fixed? If so, where is it credited to him?
