The patch titled
Subject: mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mempolicy-migration-attempt-to-match-interleave-nodes.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mempolicy-migration-attempt-to-match-interleave-nodes.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Improve alloc_migration_target_by_mpol()'s treatment of MPOL_INTERLEAVE.
Make an effort in do_mbind(), to identify the correct interleave index for
the first page to be migrated, so that it and all subsequent pages from
the same vma will be targeted to precisely their intended nodes. Pages
from following vmas will still be interleaved from the requested nodemask,
but perhaps starting from a different base.
Whether this is worth doing at all, or worth improving further, is
arguable: queue_folio_required() is right not to care about the precise
placement on interleaved nodes; but this little effort seems appropriate.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/77954a5-9c9b-1c11-7d5c-3262c01b895f@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mempolicy-migration-attempt-to-match-interleave-nodes
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -430,6 +430,11 @@ static bool strictly_unmovable(unsigned
MPOL_MF_STRICT;
}
+struct migration_mpol { /* for alloc_migration_target_by_mpol() */
+ struct mempolicy *pol;
+ pgoff_t ilx;
+};
+
struct queue_pages {
struct list_head *pagelist;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1158,8 +1163,9 @@ int do_migrate_pages(struct mm_struct *m
static struct folio *alloc_migration_target_by_mpol(struct folio *src,
unsigned long private)
{
- struct mempolicy *pol = (struct mempolicy *)private;
- pgoff_t ilx = 0; /* improve on this later */
+ struct migration_mpol *mmpol = (struct migration_mpol *)private;
+ struct mempolicy *pol = mmpol->pol;
+ pgoff_t ilx = mmpol->ilx;
struct page *page;
unsigned int order;
int nid = numa_node_id();
@@ -1214,6 +1220,7 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
struct vma_iterator vmi;
+ struct migration_mpol mmpol;
struct mempolicy *new;
unsigned long end;
long err;
@@ -1294,9 +1301,45 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start
new = get_task_policy(current);
mpol_get(new);
}
+ mmpol.pol = new;
+ mmpol.ilx = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * In the interleaved case, attempt to allocate on exactly the
+ * targeted nodes, for the first VMA to be migrated; for later
+ * VMAs, the nodes will still be interleaved from the targeted
+ * nodemask, but one by one may be selected differently.
+ */
+ if (new->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
+ struct page *page;
+ unsigned int order;
+ unsigned long addr = -EFAULT;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &pagelist, lru) {
+ if (!PageKsm(page))
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!list_entry_is_head(page, &pagelist, lru)) {
+ vma_iter_init(&vmi, mm, start);
+ for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, end) {
+ addr = page_address_in_vma(page, vma);
+ if (addr != -EFAULT)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (addr != -EFAULT) {
+ order = compound_order(page);
+ /* We already know the pol, but not the ilx */
+ mpol_cond_put(get_vma_policy(vma, addr, order,
+ &mmpol.ilx));
+ /* Set base from which to increment by index */
+ mmpol.ilx -= page->index >> order;
+ }
+ }
+
nr_failed |= migrate_pages(&pagelist,
alloc_migration_target_by_mpol, NULL,
- (unsigned long)new, MIGRATE_SYNC,
+ (unsigned long)&mmpol, MIGRATE_SYNC,
MR_MEMPOLICY_MBIND, NULL);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hughd@xxxxxxxxxx are
hugetlbfs-drop-shared-numa-mempolicy-pretence.patch
kernfs-drop-shared-numa-mempolicy-hooks.patch
mempolicy-fix-migrate_pages2-syscall-return-nr_failed.patch
mempolicy-trivia-delete-those-ancient-pr_debugs.patch
mempolicy-trivia-slightly-more-consistent-naming.patch
mempolicy-trivia-use-pgoff_t-in-shared-mempolicy-tree.patch
mempolicy-mpol_shared_policy_init-without-pseudo-vma.patch
mempolicy-remove-confusing-mpol_mf_lazy-dead-code.patch
mm-add-page_rmappable_folio-wrapper.patch
mempolicy-alloc_pages_mpol-for-numa-policy-without-vma.patch
mempolicy-mmap_lock-is-not-needed-while-migrating-folios.patch
mempolicy-migration-attempt-to-match-interleave-nodes.patch
