On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 2:12 AM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 29.09.23 21:08, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > The patch titled > > Subject: mm: non-pmd-mappable, large folios for folio_add_new_anon_rmap() > > has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is > > mm-non-pmd-mappable-large-folios-for-folio_add_new_anon_rmap.patch > > > > Andrew, please don't move these patches to stable before we have a > couple of acks from people involved in the discussions. > > I'm confident that we'll get them into 6.8. I am not :) As I repeated, the priorities seem wrong to me. There are many pending work items that don't involve any ABI changes, and IMO, we should focus on them before we even start discussing ABI changes. I've been quiet because I don't think opinion based discussions are essential to nailing down ABIs. As I suggested, I prefer a Kconfig option as the first step so that people can play with it. After we have collected field data, then we'd be better at coming up with suitable ABIs.
