[merged mm-stable] buffer-pass-gfp-flags-to-folio_alloc_buffers.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The quilt patch titled
     Subject: buffer: pass GFP flags to folio_alloc_buffers()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     buffer-pass-gfp-flags-to-folio_alloc_buffers.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: buffer: pass GFP flags to folio_alloc_buffers()
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:00:04 +0100

Patch series "Add and use bdev_getblk()", v2.

This patch series fixes a bug reported by Hui Zhu; see proposed
patches v1 and v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230811035705.3296-1-teawaterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230811071519.1094-1-teawaterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

I decided to go in a rather different direction for this fix, and fix a
related problem at the same time.  I don't think there's any urgency to
rush this into Linus' tree, nor have I marked it for stable.  Reasonable
people may disagree.


This patch (of 8):

Instead of creating entirely new flags, inherit them from grow_dev_page().
The other callers create the same flags that this function used to
create.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230914150011.843330-1-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230914150011.843330-2-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/buffer.c                 |   17 +++++++++--------
 include/linux/buffer_head.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/buffer.c~buffer-pass-gfp-flags-to-folio_alloc_buffers
+++ a/fs/buffer.c
@@ -915,16 +915,12 @@ int remove_inode_buffers(struct inode *i
  * which may not fail from ordinary buffer allocations.
  */
 struct buffer_head *folio_alloc_buffers(struct folio *folio, unsigned long size,
-					bool retry)
+					gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
-	gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 	long offset;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg, *old_memcg;
 
-	if (retry)
-		gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
-
 	/* The folio lock pins the memcg */
 	memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
 	old_memcg = set_active_memcg(memcg);
@@ -967,7 +963,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(folio_alloc_buffers);
 struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned long size,
 				       bool retry)
 {
-	return folio_alloc_buffers(page_folio(page), size, retry);
+	gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
+	if (retry)
+		gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
+
+	return folio_alloc_buffers(page_folio(page), size, gfp);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(alloc_page_buffers);
 
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev,
 			goto failed;
 	}
 
-	bh = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, size, true);
+	bh = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, size, gfp_mask | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 
 	/*
 	 * Link the folio to the buffers and initialise them.  Take the
@@ -1644,8 +1644,9 @@ void folio_create_empty_buffers(struct f
 				unsigned long b_state)
 {
 	struct buffer_head *bh, *head, *tail;
+	gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOFAIL;
 
-	head = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, blocksize, true);
+	head = folio_alloc_buffers(folio, blocksize, gfp);
 	bh = head;
 	do {
 		bh->b_state |= b_state;
--- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h~buffer-pass-gfp-flags-to-folio_alloc_buffers
+++ a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void touch_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh
 void folio_set_bh(struct buffer_head *bh, struct folio *folio,
 		  unsigned long offset);
 struct buffer_head *folio_alloc_buffers(struct folio *folio, unsigned long size,
-					bool retry);
+					gfp_t gfp);
 struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned long size,
 		bool retry);
 void create_empty_buffers(struct page *, unsigned long,
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are

mm-make-lock_folio_maybe_drop_mmap-vma-lock-aware.patch
mm-call-wp_page_copy-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-shared-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-cow-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-read-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-write-faults-to-ro-pages-under-the-vma-lock.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux